If I thought Donald Trump, whose charity is a proven slush fund and has been suspended by New York state, who can't even be bothered to release a single tax form, whose university is a complete scam that preys upon poor people, who is set to be in a pedophilia trial in December, who came back from the Soviet Union in 1987 a anti-Reaganite and an anti-NATO campaigner, who has hardly donated a single dollar to charity in decades although he claims tens of millions, who has scammed numerous contractors, who has most likely deleted court-ordered documents and/or emails since 1973 pertaining to various scandals of his, if I thought that this Donald Trump would act in a position of office any differently than Hillary Clinton, I would be voting for him.
See, Hillary is held by some of you to an impossible standard, while Donald is a barefoot boy in the grass, from your construct.
The false argument essentially goes like this:
Because Hillary has served in public office, therefore Trump will not be corrupt in public office.
That's essentially the argument that is made, and it makes no sense. Of course he hasn't done all the things she's done, because he hasn't had the opportunity yet. Anyone who thinks he'll behave any differently is either a fool or a stooge.
So, all things being equal, I'll take the tax payer, the more professional one, the more composed one, and the sane one, which is Hillary Clinton.
And I'll take her a thousand times over Gropey Don and not even think twice about it.
