Question about Neal

#1
YankeeVol

YankeeVol

Let's Geaux Peay
Joined
Mar 11, 2010
Messages
152,487
Likes
88,627
#1
Sorry if this was brought up, I didn't see it.

I thought with all the talk about Neal getting more playing time, he'd actually play....he didn't play against LSU, what gives?
 
#3
#3
because poole was running well. Moore got more carries that Oku yesterday.
 
#5
#5
Becuase poole was running with some serious purpose yesterday
 
#7
#7
No reason to ask why Neal wasn't in the game -- the real question is "why didn't we run Poole more, especially in the 4th quarter?" Oh well.
 
#9
#9
if Neal played then fans would blame Dooley for not leaving Poole in more, you can't please everyone
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#11
#11
bentenn said:
if Neal played then fans would blame Dooley for not leaving Poole in more, you can't please everyone
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Click to expand...

Everyone would have been pleased if there were 11 men on the field...
 
#13
#13
Well I know Poole was playing well...I just think Neal will end up being a good back
 
#14
#14
Poole was running with purpose. Oku got one carry, I believe. I think the problem with Neal in that situation was passing blocking responsibilities. They probably believed Chavis identified Neal as a "no threat of pass" option when he is in the backfield. And we needed all the help we could get on pass blocking.
 
New Posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

Advertisement



Back
Top