Quad 1-2 wins explained

#2
#2
Coach Jumper said:
There are many references to "Quad" wins so I thought I'd try to post and update weekly a chart for this, re our team...Hope this helps to explain it for the novice poster/reader.

PS, check me on this make sure I didn't make any errors please,,,thank you
View attachment 612881
Click to expand...
The Net just doesn't make sense when you look at the resumes of some teams ahead of Tennessee. Were 5 and 6 in Q 1 and 2 and Net is 57. Arizona is 2 and 9 and 10 and 9 record and are number 44. The variation between the rpi numbers and the NET numbers is just confusing. Were number 30 rpi and 57 net. Look at Alabama Net 33 and RPI 99 so make sense of that really hard to understand how they are coming up with their rankings. The only solution I come up with is margin of victory. Bama beat a bunch of easy teams by 40 plus points. Most of our games were closer. If that gets you in the NCAA to beat NC Wilmington by 50 and teams of that caliber what a terrible rating system.
 
  • Like
Reactions: knoxvol52, VolFuture, chuckiepoo and 1 other person
#3
#3
Volfan2012 said:
The Net just doesn't make sense when you look at the resumes of some teams ahead of Tennessee. Were 5 and 6 in Q 1 and 2 and Net is 57. Arizona is 2 and 9 and 10 and 9 record and are number 44. The variation between the rpi numbers and the NET numbers is just confusing. Were number 30 rpi and 57 net. Look at Alabama Net 33 and RPI 99 so make sense of that really hard to understand how they are coming up with their rankings. The only solution I come up with is margin of victory. Bama beat a bunch of easy teams by 40 plus points. Most of our games were closer. If that gets you in the NCAA to beat NC Wilmington by 50 and teams of that caliber what a terrible rating system.
Click to expand...
NET punishes u for beating bad teams close and doesn’t reward u for beating good teams… it’s a terrible metric
 
  • Like
Reactions: Volfan2012
#4
#4
Coach Jumper said:
There are many references to "Quad" wins so I thought I'd try to post and update weekly a chart for this, re our team...Hope this helps to explain it for the novice poster/reader.

PS, check me on this make sure I didn't make any errors please,,,thank you
Click to expand...
This would be the RPI at the end of the season, or at the time the game was played?
 
#10
#10
TN's Strength of schedule up to 15, 4 Q1 wins, and a 5-1 record in the league will undoubtedly have the Lady Vols back in the ncaa field with tomorrow's bracketology update with Charlie Creme.
 
  • Like
Reactions: knoxvol52 and chuckiepoo
#11
#11
Volfan2012 said:
The Net just doesn't make sense when you look at the resumes of some teams ahead of Tennessee. Were 5 and 6 in Q 1 and 2 and Net is 57. Arizona is 2 and 9 and 10 and 9 record and are number 44. The variation between the rpi numbers and the NET numbers is just confusing. Were number 30 rpi and 57 net. Look at Alabama Net 33 and RPI 99 so make sense of that really hard to understand how they are coming up with their rankings. The only solution I come up with is margin of victory. Bama beat a bunch of easy teams by 40 plus points. Most of our games were closer. If that gets you in the NCAA to beat NC Wilmington by 50 and teams of that caliber what a terrible rating system.
Click to expand...

Our offensive and defensive efficiency immensely impacts TN's net ranking. Being down double digits in 5 of our 6 SEC games, and winning close contests is what's keeping our NET in the 50's. We need blowouts over the bad teams, and close games against the good ones, and our NET will soar. Right now the computers see us as a very average team that is 50/50 odds to win or lose every game we play.
 
  • Like
Reactions: knoxvol52 and chuckiepoo
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top