Isn't it interesting seeing all the comments from the "experts" telling us HB is not a good QB. Many, if not most, were the same ones telling us Milton would be the greatest QB our Vols had seen, and that his cannon of an arm was unbelievable.
Straw man... constructed.
I'll just say this... IMHO very few people here were rooting for Milton. Maybe none. Personally I didn't find him all that "likeable"... and most didn't like his comment about playing well vs BGSU and the false pride it took to say it. I actually like Hooker personally but I never saw an "Hooker or bust" people when the competition was going on.
Before this was decided there were two basic groups. One was those who were ready to pull for whoever won the job. The other was those for whatever reason vested in Bailey to the point that any other decision was unacceptable to them. There might have been a few "I prefer Bailey but will support anyone" folks... but not that many and especially after Bailey didn't win out.
And btw... it is interesting seeing you "experts" that are sure HB deserves to play with the first team in spite of practices observers saying he's third... and coaches confirming it.
They consistently told those of us who wanted to see HB be given a chance, were dumb as rocks, and we had no idea what we were talking about.
Well, no. Most of us just pointed out that he HAD been given a chance and was beaten out. He's had close to 100 practices with this staff to prove he deserves to be #1 or #2. At no point since January has he been higher than #3 on the depth chart.
When we pointed out we did not need someone who could throw hard enough to knock down walls; we only needed someone who could think, and who could actually complete passes to our receivers, we were put down.
Really? By who? If he could control it Milton's arm would be an incredible weapon. He can throw it with more power flatfooted than Hooker or Bailey can stepping in. He's physically freakish. Apparently according to both the coaches and observers he won the pre-season competition going away.
Have you heard anyone who was supportive of the choice arguing that he should keep playing now that he's been failing on game day? Why? Because unlike folks like you... we aren't vested in Milton. I'm fine with Hooker or Bailey. I just want to see good QB play. You assume that others must be as loyal to one of the others as you are Bailey. We aren't. Our loyalty is with whoever gives UT the best chance to win.
And, now, here we are. Those people have abandoned Milton, and are on the bandwagon for Hooker.
Well, yeah. He's now the starter. We are rooting for him to be successful... and taking some pleasure in the fact that he's played pretty well. Not perfect... but very good.
I love my Vols, and I want us to win, but after around 70 years of living and dying as a Vol fan, I think I have a valid opinion about who can play and who cannot.
So your years as a fan makes you clairvoyant? You know things about practice that you have not seen and have not been reported to you by a reliable source?
If Bailey were ahead of either of the others throwing the ball right now... he would be no worse than #2 on the depth chart. He apparently isn't. Milton was #2 last week with a gimpy leg.
My latest proof to offer: Pruitt continued to play JG as he continued to lose games for us. Most of those same people who blast us today about Milton, were in JG's corner. This should cause anyone to think twice about giving credence to those people. They simply do not know as much as they would have us believe.
Another strawman built on completely false premises. Few people were as consistently critical of JG and the TWO coaches who continued to play him than I was. Milton started two games and did not play well. Hooker has now started two games and has played pretty good. It does not look like Heupel is repeating the same mistake at all. He also hasn't promoted Bailey just because he's there. Bailey has to earn it... and as of last week Milton with a bad leg was a better choice than Bailey. Think about that for a while.