Qanon -The Storm

Thanks for the shout out.

Trump calling out crazed lunatics who have given up on the TRUTH may be the most ironic comment ever.
Straight out of his playbook. Claim your enemy is what you actually are.

You've professed to be an agnostic/atheist. Which philosophical variety? You've argued from a very postmodern perspective of late, but I don't want to put words in your mouth.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orange_Vol1321
Thanks for the shout out.

Trump calling out crazed lunatics who have given up on the TRUTH may be the most ironic comment ever.
Straight out of his playbook. Claim your enemy is what you actually are.

Some good ol' fashioned Orwellian doublespeak.
 
You've professed to be an agnostic/atheist. Which philosophical variety? You've argued from a very postmodern perspective of late, but I don't want to put words in your mouth.
I am agnostic/atheist and I haven't a clue as to which philosophical variety. I sort of just call it my own.
But I've got to get out of this thread. It's just plain weird.
 
Thanks for the shout out.

Trump calling out crazed lunatics who have given up on the TRUTH may be the most ironic comment ever.
Straight out of his playbook. Claim your enemy is what you actually are.


Apparently you favor the Deep State, but your signing your own Death Wish.
The One World Order doesn't give one Shat about you, In their eyes your expendable just like toilet paper
 
Apparently you favor the Deep State, but your signing your own Death Wish.
The One World Order doesn't give one Shat about you, In their eyes your expendable just like toilet paper
I'll confidently hang my hat on the belief that the "one world order" gives more of a shat about me than does Trump.
 
Some of the RINOs are for sure. It's a disease and spreading like wildfire.
I meant that you can't really take a stance on any of this stuff without trying to "control" it. For example, is teaching evolution in schools a part of the "socialist" agenda? Whether you're for it or against it, you're trying to control the schools either way. Which is to say to have an opinion about education, taxation, etc and act on it, is going to create the illusion of trying to control it. Basically, what Alinsky is saying is too vague to mean anything and just being propagated as some sort incoherent fear mongering.
 
Q proof for Rod Rosenstein's removal

More proofs here
Qmap

Original tweet has capitalized misspelling "Forrest" twice

Replacement tweet both corrections "Forest" is still capitalized

Removed RR

IMG_6091.PNG

IMG_6092.PNG
 
New: Title TBD
2671
Q!!mG7VJxZNCI11 Jan 2019 - 5:15:03 AM
If a woman is selected as the nominee does that eliminate the wrap up smear re: sexual assault?
What other tactics might be planned to block and/or force name removal?
Why is the Senate important?
Who controls the Senate?
53-47
Enjoy the show.
Q
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigOrangeD
Q proof for Rod Rosenstein's removal

More proofs here
Qmap

Original tweet has capitalized misspelling "Forrest" twice

Replacement tweet both corrections "Forest" is still capitalized

Removed RR

View attachment 188299

View attachment 188302
Trump misspells Forest by adding another r to make it Forrest. He corrects the tweet with the proper spelling and since he misspelled it twice he removed two R's and that is Q's proof that Rod Rosenstein was about to step down.

Can't make this sh!t up.........wait........you can.

I don't know how you got it so wrong. Everyone knows Tom Hanks is going to be the next Chief of Staff.
 
Last edited:
Trump misspells Forest by adding another r to make it Forrest. He corrects the tweet with the proper spelling and since he misspelled it twice he removed two R's and that is Q's proof that Rod Rosenstein was about to step down.

Can't make this sh!t up.........wait........you can.

I don't know how you got it so wrong. Everyone knows Tom Hanks is going to be the next Chief of Staff.

There are hundreds of proofs. That was just one.

The odds of all the proofs combined being a coincidence is mathematically impossible.

You're in for a rude awakening.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigOrangeD
I’m interested but I’m not watching a 42 minute video. Cliff notes anybody??
- Brennan first brought the dossier to Reid in August 2016. After trump won primary.
- confirmed by pages testimony her and strozk were in London together in dec 2016. Q proof picture of them together posted dec 2017 by q.
- John Carlin was muellers chief of staff and neck deep in setting up the insurance policy- Steele dossier.
- page wouldn’t talk about investigation dragon. Purportedly about trying to disprove claims in the dossier.
That’s what I got out of it.
 

Advertisement



Back
Top