Qanon -The Storm

#1,284
#1,284
SamRebel35 said:
You noticed how many human trafficking rings (and child trafficking in particular) have been broken up the past year and a half compared to the previous 3 decades? Trump is a buffoon, but his administration is doing at least that part right. And the fact that these rings had been mostly free to operate without much interference, to me, makes it seem like they may have been protected to some degree. I don't think that's a crazy theory. May be incorrect, but given the information we have, it is at least plausible.
Click to expand...

It's plausible for Canada's leadership ring to be tied into child sex trafficking?

I just want to make sure I'm hearing you correctly.
 
#1,292
#1,292
DinkinFlicka said:
"Evidence."
Click to expand...

Call it whatever you want. There are certain facts that, when looked at in context, start to look like a pattern. I understand your need to label me a tin foil hat guy, but I think if anyone would take the time to look at the facts with an open mind, many people would see patterns in the noise. Now, there is such a thing as a false positive, so I don't insist that I'm right. But it boggles my mind how you are so certain of your position without having given so much as a preliminary glimpse at the facts. And your very attitude towards this idea means you won't even entertain the notion of looking at the facts. That being the case, I'll stop trying to convince you. There's no point. But please take a step back and realize how belligerent you sound when you automatically label people crazy nut jobs who have actually looked in to the matter.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 7 people
#1,294
#1,294
SamRebel35 said:
Call it whatever you want. There are certain facts that, when looked at in context, start to look like a pattern. I understand your need to label me a tin foil hat guy, but I think if anyone would take the time to look at the facts with an open mind, many people would see patterns in the noise. Now, there is such a thing as a false positive, so I don't insist that I'm right. But it boggles my mind how you are so certain of your position without having given so much as a preliminary glimpse at the facts. And your very attitude towards this idea means you won't even entertain the notion of looking at the facts. That being the case, I'll stop trying to convince you. There's no point. But please take a step back and realize how belligerent you sound when you automatically label people crazy nut jobs who have actually looked in to the matter.
Click to expand...

Great post Sam
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#1,295
#1,295
SamRebel35 said:
Call it whatever you want. There are certain facts that, when looked at in context, start to look like a pattern. I understand your need to label me a tin foil hat guy, but I think if anyone would take the time to look at the facts with an open mind, many people would see patterns in the noise. Now, there is such a thing as a false positive, so I don't insist that I'm right. But it boggles my mind how you are so certain of your position without having given so much as a preliminary glimpse at the facts. And your very attitude towards this idea means you won't even entertain the notion of looking at the facts. That being the case, I'll stop trying to convince you. There's no point. But please take a step back and realize how belligerent you sound when you automatically label people crazy nut jobs who have actually looked in to the matter.
Click to expand...

Have you been trying to convince me? It didn't seem as such. In fact, the one chance where I attempted to clarify your point, you responded with condescension, and I responded in kind with tin foil hats.

Regardless, I don't think I'm belligerent here. However, I do think belligerence (or outright insanity) is talking to oneself for several pages about the same three subjects. That guy agrees with you. That guy applauds your stance. That guy is your constituent.

Also, to keep the good spirits of this thread going while maintaining relevance in our discourse...
 

Attachments

  • DQmb2bBoVrGtXnGzu6M95xrMg9wyUtvwc2mbTGMynooMKra.jpeg
    DQmb2bBoVrGtXnGzu6M95xrMg9wyUtvwc2mbTGMynooMKra.jpeg
    34.1 KB · Views: 0
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#1,296
#1,296
SamRebel35 said:
Call it whatever you want. There are certain facts that, when looked at in context, start to look like a pattern. I understand your need to label me a tin foil hat guy, but I think if anyone would take the time to look at the facts with an open mind, many people would see patterns in the noise. Now, there is such a thing as a false positive, so I don't insist that I'm right. But it boggles my mind how you are so certain of your position without having given so much as a preliminary glimpse at the facts. And your very attitude towards this idea means you won't even entertain the notion of looking at the facts. That being the case, I'll stop trying to convince you. There's no point. But please take a step back and realize how belligerent you sound when you automatically label people crazy nut jobs who have actually looked in to the matter.
Click to expand...

Lol @ "looked into the matter."
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#1,297
#1,297
DinkinFlicka said:
Have you been trying to convince me? It didn't seem as such. In fact, the one chance where I attempted to clarify your point, you responded with condescension, and I responded in kind with tin foil hats.

Regardless, I don't think I'm belligerent here. However, I do think belligerence (or outright insanity) is talking to oneself for several pages about the same three subjects. That guy agrees with you. That guy applauds your stance. That guy is your constituent.

Also, to keep the good spirits of this thread going while maintaining relevance in our discourse...
Click to expand...

I haven't been trying to convince you. Your purpose in this thread has been to mock, not to discuss. No point trying. And where was the condescension from my end?

And my contribution to the thread has been specifically related to pedo/pizzagate. I can't speak to any of the other stuff in here because I don't agree with all of it and haven't looked in to much of it.

At any rate, I fully understand that I sound crazy when talking about pizzagate. But my opinions on the matter weren't formed with my Volnation reputation in mind. I have seen the pattern. I have tried to keep in mind the possibility for confirmation bias, and fully acknowledge that I could be mistaken. Still, I can't write this off as an impossibility, rather I am convinced that some elements of pizzagate are more likely true than not. If that makes you look at me like I'm crazy, so be it. You would be mistaken, however.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 9 people
New Posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

Advertisement



Back
Top