there's still a lot of time left before national LOI day. alot can happen between now and then (academic ineligibility, decommits, etc..). UF has the edge in quality, but UT has the edge in quantity.... depends on how you look at the needs of the team, in all honesty, to see who is sucessful. i.e.: Notre Dame addressing the DB, LB, D Line need is a must... so if we dont land some impact players, i'll be disappointed (even though we have recruited an all-world offense)
UF is still ranked behind UT in recruiting.![]()
you never said that initially. you said:
and i said that UT has more, UF has better quality. That statement was completely true, given the link that you provided.
I will agree with you that UT has more 5* athletes, but when one considers the quality of a recruiting pull, one has to consider every single player. b/c if you have one mediocre player for every one outstanding player, results will be mixed (see: ND this year). I would take a better average over a stacked high end b/c these athletes will have to play with each othe, and a few stars can't offset other duds.
They do, njuneardave got found out as a domer posing as a UT fan and got sent packing back to his domer boards. At least "domer" here doesn't hide his allegiances.![]()
Hey, the more the merrier. But I gotta figure they have nothing of interest to say there, or he would not be on the Vol forum...
Things that make ya' say 'hmmmm'
:hmm:
UT Avg Stars = 3.43
UF Avg Stars = 3.48
Thanks for playing.