Steve_Smith89
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2020
- Messages
- 807
- Likes
- 1,624
Probably never which is why everyone gets so pissed when he screws up. He is a 15th yr senior, we are 1000% sure #2 knows what not to do. Some how some way he continues to invent new innovative ways to screw up. This is depressingWonder how many times he’s had to repeat himself to #2 in practice/ film study.
The blocker whiffed, clearly his arm was going forward.Not sure how you blame the qb..I didn't really see this posted anywhere. Forgive me if I missed it
Correct me if I'm wrong, but when they interviewed Pruitt at the half he made a statement about HB holding the ball too long so they decided to go with JTS at that point. I'm assuming he was referring to the "fumble" by HB. (I don't think that was a fumble).
Question though...why would he yank a QB who is playing well for supposedly holding the ball too long when that same philosophy hasn't been utilized really at all the past 2-3 years with JG?
I think it was Ok, especially since Bailey knew beforehand. We are trying to find out what our Qb’s can do and the Vandy game was the perfect opportunity.You still don’t pull a true freshman QB who has completed every pass so far, and gaining confidence. You just don’t do that. That is beyond terrible coaching.
Control issues, pretty apparentYou still don’t pull a true freshman QB who has completed every pass so far, and gaining confidence. You just don’t do that. That is beyond terrible coaching.
I think HB learned a lesson from this game. He can not be allowed to form the bad habits that they let JG form. He will be a better QB because of his experience during the Vandy game. I think he will be a very good QB.I didn't really see this posted anywhere. Forgive me if I missed it
Correct me if I'm wrong, but when they interviewed Pruitt at the half he made a statement about HB holding the ball too long so they decided to go with JTS at that point. I'm assuming he was referring to the "fumble" by HB. (I don't think that was a fumble).
Question though...why would he yank a QB who is playing well for supposedly holding the ball too long when that same philosophy hasn't been utilized really at all the past 2-3 years with JG?
You still don’t pull a true freshman QB who has completed every pass so far, and gaining confidence. You just don’t do that. That is beyond terrible coaching.
I didn't really see this posted anywhere. Forgive me if I missed it
Correct me if I'm wrong, but when they interviewed Pruitt at the half he made a statement about HB holding the ball too long so they decided to go with JTS at that point. I'm assuming he was referring to the "fumble" by HB. (I don't think that was a fumble).
Question though...why would he yank a QB who is playing well for supposedly holding the ball too long when that same philosophy hasn't been utilized really at all the past 2-3 years with JG?
Maybe Shrout could have gotten more snaps but Bailey just wasn’t ready to go in week 3 after no Spring and missing most of Fall camp.You’re right. I think Pruitt is learning. If he would have kept JG on a short leash & pulled him every time he made a mistake we’d probably have 2-3 more wins then we currently have. It looked to me like HB was pissed (after getting pulled) rightfully so. Both HB & JT Shrout played very well. They really should have been playing since after the 2nd 1/2 GA collapse by JG. We certainly wouldn’t be any worse off and probably much further along.
I just rewatched that interview. He said he’s planned to play them both but since Harrison “kinda held onto the ball too long there” so he decided to go with shrout and he kinda go to clicking there. Of course he threw in some inbred slag and said I though they both done fine out there. God that drives me crazy. Why does he not try to sound intelligent? He has a college degree. Don’t tell me he doesn’t know English.
Not sure how reply upheld the call on the field. His arm went forward and even had a vicious spiral on it. Something that wild have been impossible had he not thrown itI didn't really see this posted anywhere. Forgive me if I missed it
Correct me if I'm wrong, but when they interviewed Pruitt at the half he made a statement about HB holding the ball too long so they decided to go with JTS at that point. I'm assuming he was referring to the "fumble" by HB. (I don't think that was a fumble).
Question though...why would he yank a QB who is playing well for supposedly holding the ball too long when that same philosophy hasn't been utilized really at all the past 2-3 years with JG?
I think it was Ok, especially since Bailey knew beforehand. We are trying to find out what our Qb’s can do and the Vandy game was the perfect opportunity.
I didn't really see this posted anywhere. Forgive me if I missed it
Correct me if I'm wrong, but when they interviewed Pruitt at the half he made a statement about HB holding the ball too long so they decided to go with JTS at that point. I'm assuming he was referring to the "fumble" by HB. (I don't think that was a fumble).
Question though...why would he yank a QB who is playing well for supposedly holding the ball too long when that same philosophy hasn't been utilized really at all the past 2-3 years with JG?
I feel like this job will age you. He looked rough as **** and like he didn’t know what to say.I didn't really see this posted anywhere. Forgive me if I missed it
Correct me if I'm wrong, but when they interviewed Pruitt at the half he made a statement about HB holding the ball too long so they decided to go with JTS at that point. I'm assuming he was referring to the "fumble" by HB. (I don't think that was a fumble).
Question though...why would he yank a QB who is playing well for supposedly holding the ball too long when that same philosophy hasn't been utilized really at all the past 2-3 years with JG?