We have a coach who has never been a HFC before and who had success as a coordinator with rosters that were chock full of future NFL star talent. All this gibberish about finally having a real coach is nonsense. Most of the people saying this are the same ones who were singing Butch's praises 12 months ago.
While everything you say is accurate, I think there is reason to believe Pruitt has a better chance of turning this around than Dooley and Butch did. My fear with Pruitt is that he's Muschamp 2.0, except he's inheriting less talent than Muschamp did at Florida.
Dooley had a dearth of head coaching experience, and the experience he did have wasn't impressive to say the least. He also had no prior coordinator experience. Butch had a lot more head coaching experience than Dooley did, and he was a winning coach, but it was at 2 mid-major schools in the Upper Midwest. Pruitt has no head coaching experience, but he has coordinator experience at elite programs in the SEC/southeast, and has a documented history as a recruiter.
What's funny is that when Dooley was hired, I thought he'd probably be a good recruiter (given his prior experience) but would struggle as an Xs and Os coach (never been a coordinator, bad record at Louisiana Tech). It turned out he was bad at both. When Butch was hired, I thought he'd probably be a good Xs and Os coach (given that he fielded pretty good mid-major teams) but would struggle at recruiting (given he'd never recruited in the SEC and never recruited elite high school players). It turned out to be the exact opposite.
When Pruitt was hired, I thought he'd be a good recruiter and defensive coach, but could struggle on the offensive side of the ball (both given his prior experience). I've come to realize that nobody really knows, even if you follow the sport very closely. For all I know, Pruitt might end up having great offenses but struggle on defense. I've been mostly wrong on figuring out what these coaches are going to be good and bad at.