Proof of the election fraud

#1,406
#1,406
BowlBrother85 said:
You haven't watched the videos. If you had, then you would know that the pipe burst didn't occur on the same night that you are talking about people being sent home.
Click to expand...
The way I took the video was the pipe burst was election night. The boxes coming out from under the desks happened after midnight so technically the next day. That’s the way that video came across to me. You’re making it sound like the pipe thing was the day before Election Day and it wasn’t.
 
  • Like
Reactions: davethevol
#1,407
#1,407
hUTch2002 said:
The way I took the video was the pipe burst was election night. The boxes coming out from under the desks happened after midnight so technically the next day. That’s the way that video came across to me. You’re making it sound like the pipe thing was the day before Election Day and it wasn’t.
Click to expand...
No.... The pipe burst was election night, but workers were not instructed to leave.

The pipe burst and the false theories it has spawned, is explained in the video below, taken from a local news broadcast.

Watch this video from the 1:28 until the 3:38 mark.

********************
********************

 
#1,408
#1,408
BowlBrother85 said:
No.... The pipe burst was election night, but workers were not instructed to leave.

The pipe burst and the false theories it has spawned, is explained in the video below, taken from a local news broadcast.

Watch this video from the 1:28 until the 3:38 mark.

********************
********************

Click to expand...

I saw the video. The bottom line is people did leave and then counting continued, regardless of why people left. Had Trump won and this exact thing happened you’d be freaking out about it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: davethevol, InVOLuntary and StarRaider
#1,409
#1,409
hUTch2002 said:
I saw the video. The bottom line is people did leave and then counting continued, regardless of why people left. Had Trump won and this exact thing happened you’d be freaking out about it.
Click to expand...
No. The bottom line is .... that in no way stands as proof that fraud occurred. Just like all of these allegations, what you said happened, didn't actually happen, and what did happen doesn't prove anything. You can only imply that fraud MIGHT have occurred. You can't prove a damn thing. You never can.

No elections are ever perfectly smooth in execution. Republicans only complain about how elections are administered when they lose.... and that is even true when Republicans are in charge of the elections - as Gabriel Sterling and Brad Raffensperger were in Georgia in 2020. Quit playing the victim card. It's pathetic.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TN Ribs
#1,410
#1,410
BowlBrother85 said:
No. The bottom line is .... that in no way stands as proof that fraud occurred. Just like all of these allegations, what you said happened, didn't actually happen, and what did happen doesn't prove anything. You can only imply that fraud MIGHT have occurred. You can't prove a damn thing. You never can.

No elections are ever perfectly smooth in execution. Republicans only complain about how elections are administered when they lose.... and that is even true when Republicans are in charge of the elections - as Gabriel Sterling and Brad Raffensperger were in Georgia in 2020. Quit playing the victim card. It's pathetic.
Click to expand...
That would be a good post except I never said a thing about fraud. You really suck at this.
 
#1,413
#1,413
Gandalf said:
2000 Mules Documentary Provides Compelling Evidence That 2020 Election Was Stolen › American Greatness

In the movie, True the Vote reveals that it also analyzed cell phone pings from some of the 2020 riots, and found that many of the Black Lives Matter and Antifa radicals who were involved in the riots went on to become ballot traffickers.

Each trafficker—or mule—went to an average of 23 ballot drop boxes,” according to the researchers. The mules collected ballots from stash houses in the targeted areas and deposited them in drop boxes—often in the wee hours of the morning, from 1:00 to 5:00 a.m.

Over the course of several weeks, the vote traffickers made multiple trips to drop boxes using gloves to conceal their fingerprints, and taking photos to secure payment. D’Souza notes that the traffickers started wearing gloves a few days after a ballot harvesting case in Arizona secured indictments based on fingerprint evidence.

True the Vote estimates that 20 thousand votes were illegally trafficked in Arizona, 14 thousand in Wisconsin, 275 thousand in Pennsylvania, 125 thousand in Michigan, and 30 thousand in Georgia, totaling 380 thousand votes, which is more than enough to sway the election. Minus these illegal ballots, Trump’s Electoral College votes would have been 279 to Biden’s 259, D’Souza says.

The organization notes that these numbers are based on the definition of a mule as “at least 10 visits to drop boxes.”

” If the bar is lowered to count those making at least 5 visits, the estimated affected votes increases by more than double,” the group says.

This was far more widespread than I would have guessed initially. It would have required significant coordination with a sizeable grass roots org like the local Dem party apparatus or BLM/Antifa. This is simply a magnified version of what the locals usually do but seems too smart for them to have done without too many people being in the know.

So my guess is 8-10 guys like me who are working for the national campaign (maybe 2 per swing state) but who are funded separately by zuck or something like him,. They in turn are coordinating with the Antifa org who was running their local teams. Still I would think there had to be some coordination with the local machines with this to know where best to glean the ballots.

Point is, if they actually started digging, they will find someone to squeal and roll upward. This is full on RICO and some prosecutor simply needs to get his ass in gear. Not going to come out of Biden DOJ or FBI of course but for somebody, this would be a career making case.

Previously, I had thought they were doing it with fewer people "in the know" but it seems clear here that the mules were at least partially aware of the criminality. Doing it this way there were enough people who had some knowledge that you can get someone to break into the conspiracy and to begin to roll up the chain to the leaders. Rudy used to make his bones off of this stuff but he has gotten rusty.
Click to expand...

Apparently this is a very powerful documentary. I'm sharing this story with others.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: whodeycin85, davethevol, VolinWayne and 1 other person
#1,415
#1,415
Caculator said:
Enough so that Tucker censored any mention of it on his show with the True the Vote reps
Click to expand...
The only mainstream person I hear talking about it is Dan Bongino. I haven’t watched it, but I plan to do so. Dinesh is brutally honest in his documentaries and I haven’t seen anything of his proven false yet.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BreatheUT and VolinWayne
#1,416
#1,416
davethevol said:
The only mainstream person I hear talking about it is Dan Bongino. I haven’t watched it, but I plan to do so. Dinesh is brutally honest in his documentaries and I haven’t seen anything of his proven false yet.
Click to expand...

I'm not a huge fan of Dan because he seems off putting. I'm sure he's a nice guy with good intentions but he's a little off putting. I will watch some of his show. Hannity is sorta the same. A lot of times they are right or presenting facts but I don't like the talking over guests.
 
#1,417
#1,417
BreatheUT said:
I'm not a huge fan of Dan because he seems off putting. I'm sure he's a nice guy with good intentions but he's a little off putting. I will watch some of his show. Hannity is sorta the same. A lot of times they are right or presenting facts but I don't like the talking over guests.
Click to expand...
Dan is very much a New Yorker. He’s not as subtle as Rush was.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BreatheUT
#1,418
#1,418
The AP published a “hit piece” on May 3, attempting to expose TTV’s “flawed analysis of cellphone location data and ballot drop box surveillance footage” presented in 2000 Mules. We will examine those claims, weaving in information from the movie and conversations with Engelbrecht over the weekend.

Notably, the AP story states neither D’Souza nor Engelbrecht responded to “a request for comment.” At least in Engelbrecht’s case, she was given little to no time to respond. She “received the request for comment at 11 p.m., and this story was published the next day.”


Is Geospatial Data with Cellphones Precise?
“Cellphone data is like digital DNA,” Engelbrecht explained. A court case on the precision of this technology makes that claim difficult to dispute. In response to the 2016 Supreme Court case, Carpenter v. United States, Justice Roberts wrote a 2018 opinion in which he describes the level of precision tracing afforded by pinging a cellphone using geofencing technology. “Accordingly, when the Government tracks the location of a cell phone,” writes Roberts, “It achieves near perfect surveillance as if it had attached an ankle monitor to the phone’s user.”


2000 Mules and True The Vote Debunk AP Hit Piece - UncoverDC
 
  • Like
Reactions: davethevol
#1,420
#1,420
Interestingly, apparently the fbi had tracking data on the peacefully protesters before Jan 6th. They know who go after right after it happened because they got the data early. Scary stuff
 
  • Like
Reactions: davethevol
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top