Seriously. I hate the NCAA. Yeah, I get it, it's "suspicious."
"Well Preston, you studied hard, took the time to learn and better yourself as a person, but we here at the NCAA, here in the 11th hour before the season have decided to punish you for your success. Because, well just because. Also if you marginally pass or have a bad testing day and don't get close to your score again, we're revoking your eligibility and taking your dreams away."
So correct me if I'm wrong, but that's what these stupid MFers are basically telling this young man?
If he cheated, he cheated. What is the percentage jump that it takes to get flagged anyways? I'm sure that it's based on statistical significance. I think the bigger issue is that UT must have had the same information. Hopefully this isn't a Derrick Rose situation.
This has me worried, a huge jump in the score is hard to do, even with extensive tutoring. The ACT & SAT aren't like a normal test, it's like a final for all of high school. You may be asked a math question that requires a formula you learned your junior year, but to understand that formula you need to understand the parts of it, and you learned about those parts in Soph year.
For people questioning the 2 week retake and it not lining up with the official test dates. I believe the retake is just a confirmation test, if he scores close to his original score then his original is accepted. If he doesn't score close (even if it is high enough for college acceptance) then his original will be invalidated and he'll have to do an official retake in Sept and enroll for Spring classes.
To my knowledge the clearinghouse only accepts test taken on national testing dates which would be sept 12th
I hope there are exceptions with this situation
I agree with you...does make no sense if he didn't' cheat but just had a really good testing day...but the NCAA has some ridiculous rules and this happens to be one of them.
My goodness. You still have your own version of reality. It's been repeated several time, Preston will be re-taking the test in 2 weeks. Probably because he is being forced to re-take it and it's not a case where a high school student is scheduling the test. Not real difficult to understand.
It's always been my understanding, right or wrong, that the way the standardized ACT test is designed, is that you can't make more than a 3 point or so jump from test to test and any deviation above this pretty much indicts the test taker as having achieved that score nefariously. Anybody able to shed some light on this??
It's always been my understanding, right or wrong, that the way the standardized ACT test is designed, is that you can't make more than a 3 point or so jump from test to test and any deviation above this pretty much indicts the test taker as having achieved that score nefariously. Anybody able to shed some light on this??
Actually it's says the date to retake it will be SET in the next two weeks. That could mean the day he takes the test will be in September but that he will be scheduled to take that particular test within the next two weeks. I'd wait for someone to clarify that before jumping in someone.
It's always been my understanding, right or wrong, that the way the standardized ACT test is designed, is that you can't make more than a 3 point or so jump from test to test and any deviation above this pretty much indicts the test taker as having achieved that score nefariously. Anybody able to shed some light on this??
I'm unaware of any inherent design in the ACT which makes scoring on a second attempt above a standard deviation anomalous compared to the first attempt. Many of my daughter's friend took it without any preparation to attain a "baseline". Scores in the high teens were common. Most of them jumped to mid 20s after prep on the second testing.