I disagree, in politics timing is everything. This making national headlines and played on a national stage is bigger than one ambulance chaser. This is to promote the idea women are crapped on by institutions and powerful men who align to oppress them. True the barrister and his journalistic partner are benefitting financially, but bigger fish were and are pulling these strings IMO. butchna got one but the power making this happen is not provincial, it's straight from the top.Yep, the biggest outside agenda is an ambulance chaser/ Vandy law professor looking for a big payday knowing that it's almost impossible to prove you couldn't have done something more when the Title IX lottery comes to town.
I disagree, in politics timing is everything. This making national headlines and played on a national stage is bigger than one ambulance chaser. This is to promote the idea women are crapped on by institutions and powerful men who align to oppress them. True the barrister and his journalistic partner are benefitting financially, but bigger fish were and are pulling these strings IMO. butchna got one but the power making this happen is not provincial, it's straight from the top.
It's not a feminist plot, it's simply politics as usual. What could be easily taken off the shelf, dusted, and promoted in a Title IX lawsuit during the political season? Squeaky clean Peyton, big bad institution crapping on women, players supported in raping women as part and parcel of the campus culture. Which political party or candidate nationally does this play to well? As soon as the political season passes, Wadwhani, the Tennessean/USAToday/Gannett, and this lawsuit fades away.So if it is all a feminist plot, why would they find a male lawyer to make the case for them, and how would they entice him to do so? Sorry, I'm going with the simple answer - follow the money.