President Joe Biden - Kamala Harris Administration

#40,001
#40,001
Orange defense said:
The only problem was, that he didn’t finish the wall, and took Trump’s Mexican deal of soldiers not letting them through off of the table. Now, he has caused this crises to unfold triple time.
Click to expand...
That would make him xenophobic, and you know cost the party millions of new democratic voters. He has the nerve to accuse people of politicizing the border? No other administration has ever done more to politicize our border, or lack there of , than the Biden administration.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64, W.TN.Orange Blood, tbwhhs and 1 other person
#40,002
#40,002
RDU VOL#14 said:
That would make him xenophobic, and you know cost the party millions of new democratic voters. He has the nerve to accuse people of politicizing the border? No other administration has ever done more to politicize our border, or lack there of , than the Biden administration.
Click to expand...
Biden isn’t going to do nothing, except do nothing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#40,006
#40,006
evillawyer said:
Must suck to be a Joe hater


Thread
Click to expand...


Normally you're just an easy target for ridicule (like Biden) but this doesn't square well with things like this:

Jobs Added in 2nd Quarter Revised Down From More than a Million to Just 10.5K by Philadelphia Fed

If you don't want to read it all concentrate on this:

“Estimates by the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia indicate that the employment changes from March through June 2022 were significantly different in 33 states and the District of Columbia compared with current state estimates from the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ (BLS) Current Employment Statistics (CES)." and “In the aggregate, 10,500 net new jobs were added during the period rather than the 1,121,500 jobs estimated by the sum of the states; the U.S. CES estimated net growth of 1,047,000 jobs for the period.”

These are profound differences and make for some hard questions. Over a million vs less than 11k means one side or the other has validity problems. By this I mean actual vettable reason to doubt the reliability of the source. Which leads to:

“The CES provides a timely estimate of monthly state employment data, but the QCEW follows about five months later with a more complete picture, covering more than 95 percent of all employers. Our methodology was adapted from an approach pioneered by the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas and modified to accommodate all 50 states and the District of Columbia."

This is how people start looking at these blurbs you put in from some of these people and have justified cause to think "That's total BS.".
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64, Orangeburst, NorthDallas40 and 6 others
#40,007
#40,007
hndog609 said:
Normally you're just an easy target for ridicule (like Biden) but this doesn't square well with things like this:

Jobs Added in 2nd Quarter Revised Down From More than a Million to Just 10.5K by Philadelphia Fed

If you don't want to read it all concentrate on this:

“Estimates by the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia indicate that the employment changes from March through June 2022 were significantly different in 33 states and the District of Columbia compared with current state estimates from the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ (BLS) Current Employment Statistics (CES)." and “In the aggregate, 10,500 net new jobs were added during the period rather than the 1,121,500 jobs estimated by the sum of the states; the U.S. CES estimated net growth of 1,047,000 jobs for the period.”

These are profound differences and make for some hard questions. Over a million vs less than 11k means one side or the other has validity problems. By this I mean actual vettable reason to doubt the reliability of the source. Which leads to:

“The CES provides a timely estimate of monthly state employment data, but the QCEW follows about five months later with a more complete picture, covering more than 95 percent of all employers. Our methodology was adapted from an approach pioneered by the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas and modified to accommodate all 50 states and the District of Columbia."

This is how people start looking at these blurbs you put in from some of these people and have justified cause to think "That's total BS.".
Click to expand...
It is all total BS designed to support the established bureaucracy. By the time the truth is out, and people truly realize that the "data" provided isn't real data at all, the damage has been done.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64, Orangeburst, tbwhhs and 3 others
#40,010
#40,010
ButchPlz said:
It is all total BS designed to support the established bureaucracy. By the time the truth is out, and people truly realize that the "data" provided isn't real data at all, the damage has been done.
Click to expand...

It would be one thing if you could comfortably just conclude that the revision (as stated in the article) draws on "more comprehensive, accurate job estimates". The problem is the sheer magnitude of the discrepancy. We're either looking at an "honest" failure in methodology to an extent that smacks of gross incompetence or genuine ****ery in putting out results.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#40,011
#40,011
The most ignorant & incompetent MF to ever be elected POTUS. Mr. "NO" Brain Function Biden
Shocker: Biden Blames Republicans For Border Crisis ... again this moron Biden signed an EO on day one (1) halting the construction of the border wall allowing thousands of illegal migrants to cross over into the U.S.A. But again, moron elect Joe says it's the Republicans fault that's standing in his way to bring unity & clarity. Biden is a nightmare who was let out of the loony bin.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: AM64, tbwhhs and dovervolz
#40,012
#40,012
hndog609 said:
It would be one thing if you could comfortably just conclude that the revision (as stated in the article) draws on "more comprehensive, accurate job estimates". The problem is the sheer magnitude of the discrepancy. We're either looking at an "honest" failure in methodology to an extent that smacks of gross incompetence or genuine ****ery in putting out results.
Click to expand...

I would contend that it’s both. A little of the former and a whole slew of the latter.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#40,013
#40,013
W.TN.Orange Blood said:
The most ignorant & incompetent MF to ever be elected POTUS. Mr. "NO" Brain Function Biden
Shocker: Biden Blames Republicans For Border Crisis ... again this moron Biden signed an EO on day one (1) halting the construction of the border wall allowing thousands of illegal migrants to cross over into the U.S.A. But again, moron elect Joe says it's the Republicans fault that's standing in his way to bring unity & clarity. Biden is a joke who was let out of the loony bin.
Click to expand...

But, wait...

WATCH: 17 Times the Biden Administration Said the Border Is Secure
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64, Franklin Pierce, W.TN.Orange Blood and 1 other person
#40,014
#40,014
hndog609 said:
Normally you're just an easy target for ridicule (like Biden) but this doesn't square well with things like this:

Jobs Added in 2nd Quarter Revised Down From More than a Million to Just 10.5K by Philadelphia Fed

If you don't want to read it all concentrate on this:

“Estimates by the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia indicate that the employment changes from March through June 2022 were significantly different in 33 states and the District of Columbia compared with current state estimates from the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ (BLS) Current Employment Statistics (CES)." and “In the aggregate, 10,500 net new jobs were added during the period rather than the 1,121,500 jobs estimated by the sum of the states; the U.S. CES estimated net growth of 1,047,000 jobs for the period.”

These are profound differences and make for some hard questions. Over a million vs less than 11k means one side or the other has validity problems. By this I mean actual vettable reason to doubt the reliability of the source. Which leads to:

“The CES provides a timely estimate of monthly state employment data, but the QCEW follows about five months later with a more complete picture, covering more than 95 percent of all employers. Our methodology was adapted from an approach pioneered by the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas and modified to accommodate all 50 states and the District of Columbia."

This is how people start looking at these blurbs you put in from some of these people and have justified cause to think "That's total BS.".
Click to expand...

unless it's a tweet it's not true
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64, Vol since 77, SlipKidVol and 2 others
#40,016
#40,016
hndog609 said:
It would be one thing if you could comfortably just conclude that the revision (as stated in the article) draws on "more comprehensive, accurate job estimates". The problem is the sheer magnitude of the discrepancy. We're either looking at an "honest" failure in methodology to an extent that smacks of gross incompetence or genuine ****ery in putting out results.
Click to expand...
Yep. I think I said exactly that before when I shared the same thing a month or so ago. Neither of those options is something to be happy with. Literally off by orders of magnitude.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#40,024
#40,024
AirVol said:
Because Joe is pro choice. Catholics are pro life. Joe is a lying pos and the Vatican doesn’t want his lying ass over there.
Click to expand...
But that is not exactly what she said. I don't disagree that it probably IS what their wishes are, but it isn't what they said.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dovervolz
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top