President Donald Trump - J.D. Vance Administration

#41,528
#41,528
n_huffhines said:
The most unintentionally funny **** every day

View attachment 775993
Click to expand...
This is pretty much par for the course with Trump. You can't trust what he says. There is always an ulterior motive behind it.

How about the Democrats dump their radical platforms and leftist so that they can actually run someone to compete against him? Listen to Fetterman, Bill Maher, or Stephen A Smith. That trio has ideas that could make the Democrats competitive again.
 
#41,530
#41,530
wHaT FaScIsM?

Oh you know, the kind that completely disappears hundreds of people.

As of the end of August, the whereabouts of two-thirds of more than 1,800 men detained at Alligator Alcatraz during the month of July could not be determined by the Miami Herald. The Herald had obtained the names from two detainee rosters. Around 800 detainees showed no record on ICE’s online database. More than 450 listed no location and only instructed the user to “Call ICE for details” — a vague notation that attorneys said could mean that a detainee is still being processed, in the middle of a transfer between two sites or about to be deported.

 
#41,531
#41,531
LSU-SIU said:
Ivermectin has always had benefits and treatments for humans and its not limited to the flu, my dad was on it for years for psoriatic arthritis. Ivermectin for cancer treatment is also not unheard of.

I would probably chance Ivermectin over the jab but really the only thing I take is aspirin and try and keep it minimum. Good luck too ya. 🤠

Ivermectin, ‘Wonder drug’ from Japan: the human use perspective - PMC
Click to expand...
The united states was one of the few countries that forbade it. India provided their population Ivermectin blister packs for free. I believe Mexico did as well.


Also... It's not just a horse wormer. It's a people-wormer. Many Latin countries take it a couple of times a year as parasite treatments. Basically, with their water supplies, they pretty much just assume that they're constantly accumulating parasites of some type, so they take ivermectin (or another similar treatment) occasionally, just to be safe.

My wife and I usually take a dose of Ivermectin before leaving the country, and then again on return, just for safety.

People who parrot the "horse wormer" narrative are basically just advertising their ignorance.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LouderVol, UT_Dutchman, LSU-SIU and 1 other person
#41,533
#41,533
Orange_Crush said:
The united states was one of the few countries that forbade it. India provided their population Ivermectin blister packs for free. I believe Mexico did as well.


Also... It's not just a horse wormer. It's a people-wormer. Many Latin countries take it a couple of times a year as parasite treatments. Basically, with their water supplies, they pretty much just assume that they're constantly accumulating parasites of some type, so they take ivermectin (or another similar treatment) occasionally, just to be safe.

My wife and I usually take a dose of Ivermectin before leaving the country, and then again on return, just for safety.

People who parrot the "horse wormer" narrative are basically just advertising their ignorance.
Click to expand...
Kept my beagles free of worms,ticks and fleas.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orange_Crush
#41,539
#41,539
Orange_Crush said:
The united states was one of the few countries that forbade it. India provided their population Ivermectin blister packs for free. I believe Mexico did as well.


Also... It's not just a horse wormer. It's a people-wormer. Many Latin countries take it a couple of times a year as parasite treatments. Basically, with their water supplies, they pretty much just assume that they're constantly accumulating parasites of some type, so they take ivermectin (or another similar treatment) occasionally, just to be safe.

My wife and I usually take a dose of Ivermectin before leaving the country, and then again on return, just for safety.

People who parrot the "horse wormer" narrative are basically just advertising their ignorance.
Click to expand...

Everybody agrees that it's good for parasites, like you say people use it in Latin American countries. That's why we use it for horse worms. It wouldn't be weird for you to use it on yourself if you have roundworm. The science behind the idea that it's good for viruses is shakey at best.

And IDK what it could possibly do for psoriatic arthritis. It's not an anti-inflammatory and it's not making the arthritis go away.

I asked ChatGPT why people believe Ivermectin is good for treating viruses. It checks out:

1. The in-vitro (test tube) effect​

  • In 2012 and again in 2020, researchers found that ivermectin could block replication of some viruses (including SARS-CoV-2) in cell cultures.
  • But: the concentrations used were dozens to hundreds of times higher than what’s safe or achievable in human blood.
  • This is a common issue in drug discovery — many compounds kill viruses in a petri dish but don’t work in people.


2. Early pandemic desperation​

  • During COVID-19, any lab finding that hinted at antiviral activity spread quickly.
  • Small, low-quality clinical studies (some later retracted) suggested possible benefit. These got amplified on social media, often without noting flaws in study design.
  • By the time larger, well-controlled trials were done (which showed no benefit), many people were already convinced.


3. Conflating legitimate uses​

  • Since ivermectin is a real, widely used human medication (for parasites), people trusted it more than “experimental” COVID drugs.
  • Some assumed “if it kills parasites, maybe it also kills viruses,” even though those are completely different biological targets.


4. Mistrust of institutions​

  • Distrust in government, pharma, and public health officials made some people more likely to believe that an “old, cheap drug” was being suppressed in favor of vaccines or expensive antivirals.
  • This fed conspiracy theories that reinforced ivermectin advocacy.


5. Confirmation feedback loops​

  • Online communities (Facebook groups, Telegram channels, certain podcasts) reinforced personal anecdotes (“my cousin took ivermectin and got better”) as evidence, ignoring the fact that most people with flu or COVID recover naturally anyway.
  • These narratives made it feel “proven,” even without scientific backing.
 
#41,547
#41,547
DinkinFlicka said:
You repeatedly referencing being called a dipsh*t. Lol.
Click to expand...

Odd to bring yourself into a conversation to tell me I’m hung up on something I’ve not mentioned to you at all.

Sounds a lot like projection. You seem to be going out of your way to bring this up for no apparent reason.
 
#41,549
#41,549
Vol8188 said:
Odd to bring yourself into a conversation to tell me I’m hung up on something I’ve not mentioned to you at all.

Sounds a lot like projection. You seem to be going out of your way to bring this up for no apparent reason.
Click to expand...

Is it odd? Is it bringing myself into a conversation when you are on a **forum**? Is it going out of my way to make a single observation about it before responding to you?

If you want privacy, get his email address and get pissy there. If I find your being overstimmed at being called a dipsh*t to be funny, then there's little odd about expressing it.

You are clearly irked, and it's hilarious. For the record, of all the negative connotations I'd attach to you, dipsh*t ain't one of them.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top