DC_Vol
Bush league poster
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2008
- Messages
- 22,432
- Likes
- 42,252
Fixed it for you.She's an educated person, whose political ideology is the polar opposite of my own. Since I'm closed-minded, I can't accept that an intelligent person could view politically oriented topics differently than I do. Therefore, I'm calling her childish names which denigrate her intelligence.
It wasn't a hoax. The Mueller Report did not exonerate Trump of obstruction of justice. The best thing that it could say was that there was no evidence of collusion between the Russians and the Trump campaign. She gave her opinions on the matter, but she didn't stake her reputation on how it would turn out, any more than Sean Hannity staked his reputation on the "CrowdStrike theory" or the "Seth Rich murder conspiracy theory". Anyone who watches her show understands that she is biased and she has an agenda. That is one reason why her viewers like her. She is saying things which her viewers want to hear. It is no different than what Sean Hannity does. So, why are you complaining about Maddow but not Hannity? Because Hannity is on your side of the political spectrum.Bro, she pretty much staked her credibility on a hoax.
It’s not a different orientation. It was mostly based on lies.
Maddow was a useful idiot.
Doesn’t matter how many degrees she has or how much they pay her to be a propagandist.
It wasn't a hoax. The Mueller Report did not exonerate Trump of obstruction of justice. The best thing that it could say was that there was no evidence of collusion between the Russians and the Trump campaign. She gave her opinions on the matter, but she didn't stake her reputation on how it would turn out, any more than Sean Hannity staked his reputation on the "CrowdStrike theory" or the "Seth Rich murder conspiracy theory". Anyone who watches her show understands that she is biased and she has an agenda. That is one reason why her viewers like her. She is saying things which her viewers want to hear. It is no different than what Sean Hannity does. So, why are you complaining about Maddow but not Hannity? Because Hannity is on your side of the political spectrum.
LulzIt wasn't a hoax. The Mueller Report did not exonerate Trump of obstruction of justice. The best thing that it could say was that there was no evidence of collusion between the Russians and the Trump campaign. She gave her opinions on the matter, but she didn't stake her reputation on how it would turn out, any more than Sean Hannity staked his reputation on the "CrowdStrike theory" or the "Seth Rich murder conspiracy theory". Anyone who watches her show understands that she is biased and she has an agenda. That is one reason why her viewers like her. She is saying things which her viewers want to hear. It is no different than what Sean Hannity does. So, why are you complaining about Maddow but not Hannity? Because Hannity is on your side of the political spectrum.
Paul Manafort was Trump's 2016 campaign manager during the Republican National Convention. Manafort is not in jail due to crimes related to Russian collusion, but he is in jail, nevertheless. Ditto Michael Flynn.Well then please let me know which Americans Mueller charged with crimes related to Russia collusion.
You have one thing right: she says things her viewers want to hear. But unfortunately most of it turned out to be lies. She did stake her reputation on it because it has ruined her credibility (except for those who don’t know how to think for themselves).
I don’t watch Sean Hannity. But if he spent the last three years breathlessly reporting on Tsar Donald, then I would lump him in with Maddow.
She repeatedly suggested that the President of The United States of America was a Russian agent.Paul Manafort was Trump's 2016 campaign manager during the Republican National Convention. Manafort is not in jail due to crimes related to Russian collusion, but he is in jail, nevertheless. Ditto Michael Flynn.
...and Maddow wasn't telling lies. She was giving opinions and supporting them with the best available facts. I highly doubt you have ever even watched one episode of her show.
No, she didn't. She has pondered whether or not that Trump was a "Russian asset"... and Trump gave rise to that notion by siding with Vladimir Putin in Helsinki in July of 2018, and against the conclusion of his own DNI, Dan Coats. "I don't know why it would be." ...She repeatedly suggested that the President of The United States of America was a Russian agent.
Maybe you’re unfamiliar with her work content, but there’s no question she is a useful idiot at best and a pathological liar at worst.
Paul Manafort was Trump's 2016 campaign manager during the Republican National Convention. Manafort is not in jail due to crimes related to Russian collusion, but he is in jail, nevertheless. Ditto Michael Flynn.
...and Maddow wasn't telling lies. She was giving opinions and supporting them with the best available facts. I highly doubt you have ever even watched one episode of her show.
Paul Manafort is in jail. That is a direct result of the Mueller probe.Let me repeat my question. Please let me know which Americans were charged with crimes related to Russian collusion.
Maddow is a peddler of fiction and fantasy. The last three years of her program have been dedicated to a hoax.
bwaaaaa haaaaaa haaaaaaaIt wasn't a hoax. The Mueller Report did not exonerate Trump of obstruction of justice. The best thing that it could say was that there was no evidence of collusion between the Russians and the Trump campaign. She gave her opinions on the matter, but she didn't stake her reputation on how it would turn out, any more than Sean Hannity staked his reputation on the "CrowdStrike theory" or the "Seth Rich murder conspiracy theory". Anyone who watches her show understands that she is biased and she has an agenda. That is one reason why her viewers like her. She is saying things which her viewers want to hear. It is no different than what Sean Hannity does. So, why are you complaining about Maddow but not Hannity? Because Hannity is on your side of the political spectrum.
Paul Manafort is in jail. That is a direct result of the Mueller probe.
I don't believe that you even watch her show. You are repeating what you have read in right-wing circles.
wow. You are all in on this one.No, she didn't. She has pondered whether or not that Trump was a "Russian asset"... and Trump gave rise to that notion by siding with Vladimir Putin in Helsinki in July of 2018, and against the conclusion of his own DNI, Dan Coats. "I don't know why it would be." ...
I'm certain I watch her show more than anyone else here. And a Trump supporter calling someone else a "pathological liar"? Seriously?