#Ingrate
He has one here. I doubt that he needs you as one.The mentality behind posting a picture of Michelle Obama with the words "disgusting creature" attached to it, is beyond my comprehension.
I can only conclude that you are a sad, lonely, bitter kid that for one reason or another had a traumatic childhood.
Otherwise, you are just a reprehensible human that occupies for bottom level of humanity.
I will try to pity you. Maybe one day you'll find a friend.
So, you would prefer a system where one State controls the other 49?
And hence, we have the Electoral College.
The mentality behind posting a picture of Michelle Obama with the words "disgusting creature" attached to it, is beyond my comprehension.
I can only conclude that you are a sad, lonely, bitter kid that for one reason or another had a traumatic childhood.
Otherwise, you are just a reprehensible human that occupies for bottom level of humanity.
I will try to pity you. Maybe one day you'll find a friend.
Ummmmm....
It's a national election.this the only example in the entire system where the winner may not, in fact, win.
Irony number one is that Trump lost by almost 3 million votes, yet is president elect due to shallow demagoguery, partisan influence by an FBI Director, and the Russian interference.
Irony number two is that the Electoral college is designed to thwart such those very things, and will make him official tomorrow.
Irony number three is that Trump tricked the voters in rural small states into thinking he is a champion for them against the rich, and upon election he puts in power a dozen or so people worth more than 100,000,000 others.
He is president elect because he tapped into the anger and resentment of the rust belt towards the Democrats economic platform, and won Florida.
The popular vote is not and never has been what determines the winner. Many people have an issue with it being this way, but that is how it is and has been. He won, and the popular vote has absolutely no bearing on it. If it's so screwed up maybe someone should have changed it in the past 200 years. Neither candidate was campaigning to win the popular vote, and if they were each of their strategies would have been different. The winner won.
The democrats are very racially divisive which is why I won't vote for them.
Ummmmm....
It's a national election.this the only example in the entire system where the winner may not, in fact, win.
Irony number one is that Trump lost by almost 3 million votes, yet is president elect due to shallow demagoguery, partisan influence by an FBI Director, and the Russian interference.
Irony number two is that the Electoral college is designed to thwart such those very things, and will make him official tomorrow.
Irony number three is that Trump tricked the voters in rural small states into thinking he is a champion for them against the rich, and upon election he puts in power a dozen or so people worth more than 100,000,000 others.
Ummmmm....
It's a national election.this the only example in the entire system where the winner may not, in fact, win.
Irony number one is that Trump lost by almost 3 million votes, yet is president elect due to shallow demagoguery, partisan influence by an FBI Director, and the Russian interference.
Irony number two is that the Electoral college is designed to thwart such those very things, and will make him official tomorrow.
Irony number three is that Trump tricked the voters in rural small states into thinking he is a champion for them against the rich, and upon election he puts in power a dozen or so people worth more than 100,000,000 others.
They did, and still got a large majority of the vote.
What does that say about Trump's "mandate"?