rbroyles
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 4, 2006
- Messages
- 14,711
- Likes
- 4
I said that in the beginning of my statement. I said that anytime someone is murdered it is a tragedy. But I don't think it's unfair or irrational at all to consider a potential future doctor and leader a greater loss over just some guy that sits around all day and neglects to pay child support.
Please actually listen to what I'm saying, I would agree that I think that it's unfair to weigh one person's life over another persons. We all have people that love and care about us and rely on us. I acknowledge that even the guy that sits around and neglects to pay child support probably has people that value his life and it'd be sad if he were to be murdered. But at the same time I think it is without a doubt a greater loss for society to lose someone who was a leader and future doctor. Which does the world need more of?
Are you saying murder becomes less a crime as your perceived value of the victem to society decreases. If so, at what level of worthiness would the murderer become a benefactor to society by ridding us of a valueless member?
