LebanonVolunteer
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2011
- Messages
- 18,695
- Likes
- 1,376
Dooley was the ONLY coach? Maybe for 2 million dollars he was. Hamilton was shopping with bottom of the SEC money. It makes sense we got a bottom of the SEC type coach.
I get the excuses you try to use. I just don't buy it. Dooley's issues in year 3 have NOTHING to do with Fulmer. Is it Fulmers fault Lane ran off a bunch of the players he recruited? Is it Fulmers fault that kids who had been on the roster 2-3 years after he was fired were not coached up by Kiffin and or Dooley? You make it sound like Dooley was starting a new football program from scratch. I get that is what you try and portray, it's just not the case. Dooley is a losing coach. He always has been. Blaming Fulmer for Dooley losing is just a reach at best. I understand your feeling you need to justify the loses somehow. I just don't agree.
I get the excuses you try to use. I just don't buy it. Dooley's issues in year 3 have NOTHING to do with Fulmer. Is it Fulmers fault Lane ran off a bunch of the players he recruited? Is it Fulmers fault that kids who had been on the roster 2-3 years after he was fired were not coached up by Kiffin and or Dooley? You make it sound like Dooley was starting a new football program from scratch. I get that is what you try and portray, it's just not the case. Dooley is a losing coach. He always has been. Blaming Fulmer for Dooley losing is just a reach at best. I understand your feeling you need to justify the loses somehow. I just don't agree.