VolsNSkinsFan
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 4, 2007
- Messages
- 15,813
- Likes
- 3,974
I've never heard of the place prior to the election (and neither have any of my friends) but the fact that Jake Tappers wife said it was her favorite restaurant in Washingtonian Magazine makes me LOL. (Best pizza in DC is the Italian Store in Arlington)
No. I have found a few pieces that are compelling. There is no smoking gun, and I doubt there ever will be. I've mentioned in this very thread that if I was on a jury, I don't think any of this evidence would be enough for me to vote guilty against anyone. That being said, the evidence that I find compelling is enough to raise the scandal to the level of "plausible" or even "likely" for a few aspects of it. And I don't think it is up to me to convince people who don't want to research it themselves. Go and look at the evidence or don't. I don't really care because you aren't writing articles calling it made up bullsh!t without having ever read the first piece of evidence.
PKT has echoed my own thoughts on this matter. I haven't followed any mainstream media regarding this, so I haven't been "sullied" by whatever narrative you think they are pushing. I've read what's been posted in this thread, and do not find any of this compelling whatsoever. Most of it is laughable, with the connections trying to be made.
Child trafficking rings exist. Nothing posted here has suggested this is one, to me. It reads as bat**** at worst and a huge stretch at best.
PKT has echoed my own thoughts on this matter. I haven't followed any mainstream media regarding this, so I haven't been "sullied" by whatever narrative you think they are pushing. I've read what's been posted in this thread, and do not find any of this compelling whatsoever. Most of it is laughable, with the connections trying to be made.
Child trafficking rings exist. Nothing posted here has suggested this is one, to me. It reads as bat**** at worst and a huge stretch at best.
PKT has echoed my own thoughts on this matter. I haven't followed any mainstream media regarding this, so I haven't been "sullied" by whatever narrative you think they are pushing. I've read what's been posted in this thread, and do not find any of this compelling whatsoever. Most of it is laughable, with the connections trying to be made.
Child trafficking rings exist. Nothing posted here has suggested this is one, to me. It reads as bat**** at worst and a huge stretch at best.
I must concur at this point. The "evidence" ain't there. And I'm thinking those that truly believe this also believe that the holocaust never happened and we never landed on the moon.
Your thoughts are incorrect. Overwhelming evidence that the holocaust happened. And I firmly believe we landed on the moon. Furthermore, I don't believe our government demolished the WTC. I don't believe Sandy Hook, San Bernadino, Orlando, or Chattanooga were false flag operations. To put it plainly, I'm not a conspiracy theorist. I believe there is enough evidence to raise this scandal to the level of "plausible".
Your thoughts are incorrect. Overwhelming evidence that the holocaust happened. And I firmly believe we landed on the moon. Furthermore, I don't believe our government demolished the WTC. I don't believe Sandy Hook, San Bernadino, Orlando, or Chattanooga were false flag operations. To put it plainly, I'm not a conspiracy theorist. I believe there is enough evidence to raise this scandal to the level of "plausible".
I've never heard of the place prior to the election (and neither have any of my friends) but the fact that Jake Tappers wife said it was her favorite restaurant in Washingtonian Magazine makes me LOL. (Best pizza in DC is the Italian Store in Arlington)
I think we need to draw a distinction here. There is definitely evidence out there, and much of it is solid. But keep in mind that 95+% of it has been assembled by amateurs digging around on the web. They've done a serviceable job, but still amateurs for the most part, with no resources aside from the web. Have they gotten enough to convict someone in a court of law? Surely not. But surely they have pointed out enough for some self-respecting and honest law enforcement agency to take an interest in it. And imagine what an actual investigative team could add to what's already been found, with significant powers and methods that go well beyond digging around on the web. That is all people want, an honest look at this by someone with true authority and resources to dig up the truth. If that happened, it would either fly or it would crash, and I think people would be satisfied. All we have now are unconvincing denials and mockery by untrustworthy news sources. That's why people are righteously pissed about this.
All we have now are unconvincing denials and mockery by untrustworthy news sources.
Assange's prolonged absence from public view is another factor/concern for me as far as this story goes.
Until Assange is seen again I will continue to doubt the "fake news" byline being used by the MSM.
Where is Julian Assange?
