Pizza time?

#326
#326
volfanhill said:
You are correct about this. If this were solely a Clinton thing many on here would have already convicted him. In fact some have. The problem is you wouldn’t be calling for an investigation into Clinton. But you are now. There is plenty of smoke around Billy boy on this too. Why kick secret service off the plane for your boys trip to pedo island? I have no problem investigating either one. You are just a giant hypocrite. That’s why you are scoffed at.
Click to expand...


The difference is that no one has made a sworn allegation of pedophilia against Clinton, whereas someone did against Trump. If there were such an allegation against Clinton then you are right, it should be investigated.

As far as this particular guy Epstein is concerned, both Clinton and Trump have connections to him. That is not all that surprising given his connections to the wealthiest and powerful. That alone does not merit much discussion. But as I say there seems to be significant grounds to question in particular Trump's alleged participation.
 
#327
#327
lawgator1 said:
The difference is that no one has made a sworn allegation of pedophilia against Clinton, whereas someone did against Trump. If there were such an allegation against Clinton then you are right, it should be investigated.

As far as this particular guy Epstein is concerned, both Clinton and Trump have connections to him. That is not all that surprising given his connections to the wealthiest and powerful. That alone does not merit much discussion. But as I say there seems to be significant grounds to question in particular Trump's alleged participation.
Click to expand...

One would think that the NY State Attorney General would be all over this if there were any validity to these allegations. I can't imagine her or any of her predecessors going back to Cuomo were/are Trump fans.
 
#328
#328
lawgator1 said:
The difference is that no one has made a sworn allegation of pedophilia against Clinton, whereas someone did against Trump. If there were such an allegation against Clinton then you are right, it should be investigated.

As far as this particular guy Epstein is concerned, both Clinton and Trump have connections to him. That is not all that surprising given his connections to the wealthiest and powerful. That alone does not merit much discussion. But as I say there seems to be significant grounds to question in particular Trump's alleged participation.
Click to expand...
I think it was Clinton that flew to Epstein's Fantasy Island on Epstein's jet 26 times in 2 years, not Trump.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NEO
#329
#329
1972 Grad said:
I think it was Clinton that flew to Epstein's Fantasy Island on Epstein's jet 26 times in 2 years, not Trump.
Click to expand...


As I say, mere connections should not be enough to justify investigation. The guy had to know thousands of powerful people.

But there is a sworn allegation against Trump. That is the difference.
 
#330
#330
lawgator1 said:
As I say, mere connections should not be enough to justify investigation. The guy had to know thousands of powerful people.

But there is a sworn allegation against Trump. That is the difference.
Click to expand...
26 times for Clinton ? I guess Bill just likes the sun. He still looks awfully pale to be going to an island. Maybe he doesn't tan well?
 
  • Like
Reactions: NEO
#331
#331
lawgator1 said:
As I say, mere connections should not be enough to justify investigation. The guy had to know thousands of powerful people.

But there is a sworn allegation against Trump. That is the difference.
Click to expand...
Trust me on this. Pelosi's daughter trying to get out in front of this doesn't bode well for your side.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FallCreekVols
#332
#332
lawgator1 said:
The difference is that no one has made a sworn allegation of pedophilia against Clinton, whereas someone did against Trump. If there were such an allegation against Clinton then you are right, it should be investigated.

As far as this particular guy Epstein is concerned, both Clinton and Trump have connections to him. That is not all that surprising given his connections to the wealthiest and powerful. That alone does not merit much discussion. But as I say there seems to be significant grounds to question in particular Trump's alleged participation.
Click to expand...
Obviously no one has brought charges and she filed civil suits against trump twice. One was thrown out and the second time she withdrew her suit. Then she skipped out on a press conference. An allegation alone doesn’t mean squat. I will call Trump a pedo, or at minimum an pedo enabler, if he pardons Epstein. Don’t think that’s going to happen. I am still waiting on your explanation as to why you just now want this investigated. Surely you can see why I think your motivations are suspect at best.
 
  • Like
Reactions: McDad and NorthDallas40
#333
#333
lawgator1 said:
As far as this particular guy Epstein is concerned, both Clinton and Trump have connections to him. That is not all that surprising given his connections to the wealthiest and powerful. That alone does not merit much discussion.
Click to expand...

It doesn't? Even if they were hanging out together socially in the time frame of the allegations?
 
  • Like
Reactions: NEO
#334
#334
lawgator1 said:
As I say, mere connections should not be enough to justify investigation. The guy had to know thousands of powerful people.

But there is a sworn allegation against Trump. That is the difference.
Click to expand...

Ok, why hasn't the NY AG investigated?
 
#337
#337
People keep throwing around the word "pedo". Was Epstein dealing in prepubescent kids or are we talking 16-year-olds?
 
#339
#339
Big Gucci Sosa said:
14 but how would 16 not be in that range as well??????????
Click to expand...

Because a pedo is someone who sexually abuses children. Assaulting a 10-year-old is far worse than having sex with a 16-year-old, IMO. Elvis married a 14-year-old. Are we calling him a pedo? I'm just trying to get my head around what Epstein did, so I'm looking for clarification.
 
#340
#340
n_huffhines said:
Because a pedo is someone who sexually abuses children. Assaulting a 10-year-old is far worse than having sex with a 16-year-old, IMO. Elvis married a 14-year-old. Are we calling him a pedo?
Click to expand...
Damn the LDS got you twisted. Elvis married that chick when she was 21
 
#341
#341
n_huffhines said:
Because a pedo is someone who sexually abuses children. Assaulting a 10-year-old is far worse than having sex with a 16-year-old, IMO. Elvis married a 14-year-old. Are we calling him a pedo? I'm just trying to get my head around what Epstein did, so I'm looking for clarification.
Click to expand...

Jerry Lee Lewis married the 14 year old.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FallCreekVols and n_huffhines
#342
#342
Big Gucci Sosa said:
Damn the LDS got you twisted. Elvis married that chick when she was 21
Click to expand...

My bad, they started courting at age 14. Much better.

What does clarifying the definition of words have to do with the LDS church? Are you saying that diddling a 4 year old is the same thing as having sex with a 17 year old?
 
#346
#346
n_huffhines said:
Because a pedo is someone who sexually abuses children. Assaulting a 10-year-old is far worse than having sex with a 16-year-old, IMO. Elvis married a 14-year-old. Are we calling him a pedo? I'm just trying to get my head around what Epstein did, so I'm looking for clarification.
Click to expand...
Priscilla was 14 when they met while he was in the army but they married when she was 21. Colonel Tom Parker would have killed him if he had tried to marry her any sooner than that.
 
#347
#347
#349
#349
BowlBrother85 said:
Priscilla was 14 when they met while he was in the army but they married when she was 21. Colonel Tom Parker would have killed him if he had tried to marry her any sooner than that.
Click to expand...

Yeah, and they never once banged, I'm sure.
 
New Posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

Advertisement



Back
Top