butchna
Sit down and tell me all about it...way over there
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2013
- Messages
- 106,839
- Likes
- 224,348
Hard to say about Marvin Harrison - he played basically his entire career with Peyton, however, he had a really productive rookie and second seasons, then Peyton came along. Same for Reggie Wayne; he had a great year with Luck in Luck's rookie year, but then was injury-plagued after that. Welker put up better numbers and made all his Pro Bowls with Brady, not Peyton, but he was made a great receiver by both. Harrison and Wayne, I think, would have had great careers elsewhere not playing with Peyton. Welker...I'm not so sure.
Adding Corey Dillon to Brady's list is fair. I honestly totally forgot about him. However it is worth noting that Dillon only had one really good year in NE, which was his first. Brady has never had elite weapons, particularly pass catchers, remain on his teams for extended periods of time. Peyton has had a lot more of those guys than
And they were great because of him. Wayne was productive but not Pro Bowl level and Edgerrin James was a spare at Arizona when he was still at a young age. The concussions kinda wrecked what Welker had going in Denver. Through 11 games he had matched his TD total for any season with the Pats...but youre right. His production at NE was HOF worthy which lends to the fact that NEITHER Brady nor Peyton made him great...he already was. Dallas Clark was transcendent with Indy...didnt do jack with Tampa Bay. Harrison had a decent 800 yard season as a rookie. He became a HOF because Peyton threw him into top 5 production receiving numbers. No Indy OL moved to another team and registered...Patriots have had several, and recently (Nate Solder the latest). The Pats refused to pay their Deion Branches and Terry Givens so their career numbers werent inflated by a long association with Tom Brady, which inflated this fallacy that he didnt have talent. Belichick would have never retained a Harrison or Wayne through the end of their careers. Truth is BOTH Peyton and Brady made/make their weapons better and there was no advantage for Peyton in that department. Ive conceded a couple of Super Bowls ago that Brady will be remembered as the superior QB...because of his championships, not because of the reasons youre asserting.