Daddy Gee
this is not me ↓
- Joined
- Nov 18, 2007
- Messages
- 5,410
- Likes
- 213
With all the opinions on Fulmer, can you imagine the gnashing of teeth we'd have on Dickey, arguably best AD we've had, who played at UF and left UT to coach at FL? Don't think he'd last past the public sentiment on social media to be a finalist. All I'm saying is that the folks making the decision certainly will know if Fulmer checks all the boxes for a modern day AD, outside of past accomplishments. If he does, he should certainly be in the mix...if no, let's move on and make a decision at some point.
I'm personally fine with the hire. Phil knows the workings of UT inside and out and there is absolutely no doubt he will make decisions based on what's best for the school. The man has devoted the majority of his life to TN as a player and coach.
Part of the reason it used to be cool for a former player to ascend to AD was because, in the past, nothing mattered but football. Now other stuff matters to fans. 25 years ago Tennessee fans (not alum, just "fans") were Tennessee football fans and Kentucky basketball fans. Those times are changing. People are becoming fans of a university's entire lineup of teams. And now that people are no longer cherry picking their allegiances, the Athletic Director needs to be able to dedicate time to all sports, not just football.
I don't believe Phillip Fulmer is going to be able to be successful at overseeing all sports at Tennessee.
When you hear the statement that Blackburn wasn't a serious option when 80 percent of the base wanted him. Flags should be raised. I agree with your assessment however.precedents being what they are, i understand where this comes from, but while i full believe Fulmer wanted the job and actively (while maybe behind the scenes primarily) lobbied for the job, i don't think there was any "ant-blackburn" rhetoric going on.
and even if there was, the fact that that could be allowed to influence such a decision, says more about the influenced, than it does the influencer.
Part of the reason it used to be cool for a former player to ascend to AD was because, in the past, nothing mattered but football. Now other stuff matters to fans. 25 years ago Tennessee fans (not alum, just "fans") were Tennessee football fans and Kentucky basketball fans. Those times are changing. People are becoming fans of a university's entire lineup of teams. And now that people are no longer cherry picking their allegiances, the Athletic Director needs to be able to dedicate time to all sports, not just football.
I don't believe Phillip Fulmer is going to be able to be successful at overseeing all sports at Tennessee.
I can't understand why people would assume non-football sports would suffer. Why assume that? Look at Alvarez in Wisconsin? He's obsessed with football to the point that he probably meddles a little bit too much and Wisconsin went to their first NCAA final in 74 years on his watch.
Point is, if our AD hires the right people, he can just get out of the way.
Part of the reason it used to be cool for a former player to ascend to AD was because, in the past, nothing mattered but football. Now other stuff matters to fans. 25 years ago Tennessee fans (not alum, just "fans") were Tennessee football fans and Kentucky basketball fans. Those times are changing. People are becoming fans of a university's entire lineup of teams. And now that people are no longer cherry picking their allegiances, the Athletic Director needs to be able to dedicate time to all sports, not just football.
I don't believe Phillip Fulmer is going to be able to be successful at overseeing all sports at Tennessee.
You seriously believe he had real opportunities to be a HC after he was let go? :loco:
This will go down with the Dooley & Tyndall hirings as some of the dumbest things this University has done with Athletics in the last 20 years!