Thunder Good-Oil
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 2, 2011
- Messages
- 49,318
- Likes
- 52,134
Because the pool of candidates that he's filled the open UTC coaching positions with weren't far beyond the high school level.
Do we want a visible figurehead who has the potential to get us all rowing in the same direction to recapture the glory days? Or do we want the guy with the best resume? Right now, I'd say motivator-in-chief is more important than technical expertise. While DB may be a rockstar in the world of ADs he is, respectfully, nobody to 90%+ of our fanbase.
Fulmer's success was in one portion of the AD. Blackburn worked in several different areas of the UTAD before becoming an actual AD. Blackburn is clearly, and you cannot debate it without looking bad, more qualified to run the UTAD right now.
Not to turn the thread into a debate on this point but let's be honest and say that BB directed the slow erosion of what Dickey built. The record and the roster both moved in the wrong direction on his watch and it took a TN man coming off a national championship at Pitt several years to fix it.I agree with all your assessments outside of the comment that Bill Battle was not a good head coach.
His overall winning percentage in regular season and bowl games is better than average....
Bill Battle
Career Record: 7 Years, 59-22-2, .723 Win% (at major schools)
Bowl Record: 5 Games, 4-1, .800 Win% (at major schools)
Do we want a visible figurehead who has the potential to get us all rowing in the same direction to recapture the glory days? Or do we want the guy with the best resume? Right now, I'd say motivator-in-chief is more important than technical expertise. While DB may be a rockstar in the world of ADs he is, respectfully, nobody to 90%+ of our fanbase.
I understand you probably wanted Blackburn, but the reasons NOT to hire Phil I don't think are very solid. After all Bill Battle wasn't a good Head Coach, but just look where he got Alabama football. (Obviously Phil was light years above Bill)
I'm looking at the situation this way, even tho he has never been an AD before I think if he didn't have enough knowledge they wouldn't consider the hire, what would be t
And on a final note I think what Phil brings to the table as a recruiter can definitely translate to his new position with making hires, influencing boosters, ect ect.
I get not everyone will like the hire, I just don't understand why everyone is being so nasty about someone who loves the place so much. Hell he could of taken another job after we fired him, but didn't because he loves this place so much because this is the only place he wants to be.
How is that not someone you want in charge of Tennessee athletics?!?
All that you have to do is look at Blackburn's recent tweets and his pissing match with a top level booster to see that he might not be the ideal candidate for this particular job.
I agree with all your assessments outside of the comment that Bill Battle was not a good head coach.
His overall winning percentage in regular season and bowl games is better than average....
Bill Battle
Career Record: 7 Years, 59-22-2, .723 Win% (at major schools)
Bowl Record: 5 Games, 4-1, .800 Win% (at major schools)
Give me the qualified guy anyday...Especially when our AD is in the disarray it has been in for about a decade. This goes well beyond football.
Even though I agree with you, I think you're wasting your 'breath'.. Many on here idolize Phil and his actual qualifications take a back seat.. I don't think Phil is the worst we can do but he's not the best either and that is what the BoT SHOULD be shooting for.. However, they will do what they do and hire the middle of the road, safe, feel good candidate...
Business as usual...
If you're going to go there, then tell us about Blackburn's Natty.
I'm going to assume that was done after he got the news that we're all currently processing. Disappointment is hard to keep to oneself in the age of social media. I won't hold it against him.I got to admit, that took me way off guard.
From someone who has reached legendary status on VN as a decision-maker, that sure seemed like a poor one if DB wanted the job.
I can't see how Fulmer could be any worse than anyone else. It's all a gamble. Besides, he's the one that will excuse Tyler Summitt and bring him into the Vols (Lady) coaching arena where he belongs one day.
Based upon what? The performance of the individual programs in their league? No disrespect, I think you're all wet on this one. UTC has national championship caliber programs in multiple sports. That cannot be dismissed because they are Division II. Blackburn is not coaching....He's putting the right pieces in place and providing support and guidance. No matter where they came from, if he's responsible for them being there it's a feather in his cap from a personel standpoint.
You want to talk about hiring SNAFU's let's talk about Dave Clawsen.
I understand you probably wanted Blackburn, but the reasons NOT to hire Phil I don't think are very solid. After all Bill Battle wasn't a good Head Coach, but just look where he got Alabama football. (Obviously Phil was light years above Bill)
I'm looking at the situation this way, even tho he has never been an AD before I think if he didn't have enough knowledge they wouldn't consider the hire, what would be the point?
And on a final note I think what Phil brings to the table as a recruiter can definitely translate to his new position with making hires, influencing boosters, ect ect.
I get not everyone will like the hire, I just don't understand why everyone is being so nasty about someone who loves the place so much. Hell he could of taken another job after we fired him, but didn't because he loves this place so much because this is the only place he wants to be.
How is that not someone you want in charge of Tennessee athletics?!?
I'm personally fine with the hire. Phil knows the workings of UT inside and out and there is absolutely no doubt he will make decisions based on what's best for the school. The man has devoted the majority of his life to TN as a player and coach.
There's this thing called the Peter Principle. There is no guarantee that Blackburn would be successful at the highest level of college sports administration. His Rolodex being loaded with lower division contacts doesn't necessarily translate to getting the job done at the D-1. P-5 level. But if getting the correct detergent requisitioned to wash the jocks with is the most important aspect, then Blackburn is the probably right guy for the job.