Ok, here are some clues as to the point I am making:
What specific element of the new contract is causing Pearl to refuse to sign it? Think about it. Why wouldn't Pearl have signed it by now?
He's agreed to the pay reduction - so it's not about money.
He says he wants to be here for a long time, and feels fortunate to still be here now - so it's not about the length of the contract.
If Tennessee were going to can him, they wouldn't have offered a new contract (and he'd be gone) - so it isn't Tennessee that's either wanting rid of him, or is hanging this up.
It isn't because of the stipulations about 'AA compliance, as those were already in place in the original contract.
I am certain that there are more than a few people on here who can answer this question if they want to - or perhaps someone can simply piece it together.
And if someone does say it / figures it out - even Pearl's most ardent supporters will find it difficult, if not impossible, to continue defending him.
It's right under your noses, VolNation.