BeardenVol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2014
- Messages
- 74
- Likes
- 103
They knew it was time for a new coach, knew we werent going to any bowls anytime soon anyway and saw a path to fire Pruitt with cause.It was a calculated decision. Primary factor was money. UT probably figured that it made more sense to suffer sanctions for a few seasons than face a buyout that they simply could not afford. Trying to choose the lesser of two evils
stupid for admitting violations. NCAA is inept and can't prove a he said, she said case. Best practice is to obfuscate a while then settle."
Thinks management had ulterior motive for falling on sword so swiftly.
He says that because he knows pruitt just did what Bama does but got caught at a place that won’t stand for it
“Limfacs”? Not being a smartazz. I’m genuinely confused about what your phone did to you....One of them was, and I’m paraphrasing here “Did the Chancellor help or hurt the University in admitting Pruitt committed X amount of Level 1 violations.
There was some back and forth about the benefits and Limfacs then they started talking about Pruitt fighting the charges and show cause, to get hired somewhere else and try to get some buyout cash.
TN did it to be able to fire Pruitt without having to pay any buyout. Why else would they pay big bucks
to bring in people to investigate themselves. Spend a little to save a lot. TN got exactly what they wanted
and so did the majority of the fans. Good riddance.
Or maybe the guy sucked as a HC and the fact we knew dirty **** was going on and could save 12M.... If Pruitt knew how to be a HC and handle a QB situation and not be an arrogant dick he would still be the HC....stupid for admitting violations. NCAA is inept and can't prove a he said, she said case. Best practice is to obfuscate a while then settle."
Thinks management had ulterior motive for falling on sword so swiftly.