The problem is what this means when it comes to litigation exposure. Let's say the SEC plays and an athlete gets very sick, just one, which the statistics say will happen out of that sample size. Doesn't matter if he dies, experiences long-term heart issues or long-term lung issues. Now the lawyers come in, not the hacks but top tier plaintiffs' attorneys (these are the guys that almost never lose). They will argue that the university took an unreasonable risk in light of the fact that several mid-majors and at least 2 of the majors cancelled their season, but the evil university this athlete played for put money above his life and that the kid couldn't really say no because of peer pressure, pressure from the coaches or fear of loss of scholarship.
The damages, particularly the punitives, could add up to hundreds of millions. I believe you'll see at least one more Power 5 cancel and at that point the two remaining ones won't want to assume that risk.
You may not think the Pac-12 and the Big-10 are not any good but if they're not going to play, it significantly increases the probability the season gets cancelled.
Wouldn’t that same logic open suit against any business or school in the country? A case like this would go all the way to the Supreme Court, unless Congress passes legislation on liabilities.