feathersax
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2008
- Messages
- 16,849
- Likes
- 33,905
The "economics" of it are a disaster. Our revenues are way down, we'd have to pay a huge buyout, and we'd probably end up getting a 4th tier coach that we'd have to fire 3-4 years down the road (see South Carolina's current disaster of a coach search). This is the type of move that if it doesn't work out, could set the entire program back 10 years.
Pruitt hasn't done a great job this year, but this is foolishness. Give him a real year so we can see how this great Freshmen class does with an actual offseason and let's see how Bailey and / or Salter do next year. If things still suck, we look for a coach in 2021 when it's much easier to do so.
I don't necessarily like that I agree on this , but I do. I think $$$ concerns, are real, plus it is legitimate that every team had to deal w/ different covid effects timeline diff. In our case, we had impacts to our pre-season development more than others, from what I understand. I keep going back to less of a Pruitt thing and more to the fact that I THINK Pruitt has a pretty good staff...these guys all collectively didn't become bad coaches all of the sudden. Something's clearly going on, but think they'll all get an audible for another chance to pull it together next year.The "economics" of it are a disaster. Our revenues are way down, we'd have to pay a huge buyout, and we'd probably end up getting a 4th tier coach that we'd have to fire 3-4 years down the road (see South Carolina's current disaster of a coach search). This is the type of move that if it doesn't work out, could set the entire program back 10 years.
Pruitt hasn't done a great job this year, but this is foolishness. Give him a real year so we can see how this great Freshmen class does with an actual offseason and let's see how Bailey and / or Salter do next year. If things still suck, we look for a coach in 2021 when it's much easier to do so.
Are we supposed to believe that our 5th coach in 13 years is what sets us back 10 years, and not the current guy who has us posed to go 2-7 in Year 3? There are plenty of logical or sound arguments to make about why Pruitt won't be fired, but saying it would set the program back 10 years is dumb. We're in year THIRTEEN of a rebuild.
The "economics" of it are a disaster. Our revenues are way down, we'd have to pay a huge buyout, and we'd probably end up getting a 4th tier coach that we'd have to fire 3-4 years down the road (see South Carolina's current disaster of a coach search). This is the type of move that if it doesn't work out, could set the entire program back 10 years.
Pruitt hasn't done a great job this year, but this is foolishness. Give him a real year so we can see how this great Freshmen class does with an actual offseason and let's see how Bailey and / or Salter do next year. If things still suck, we look for a coach in 2021 when it's much easier to do so.
The economics probably aren't going to be great for the foreseeable future IMO.
Do you understand how debt works?
$20 million is the price tag. In a year where revenues plummeted (and may still be down next year). Add on top of that the fact that no top-tier coach in their right mind is coming here at the end of a Covid season. Also add on top of that the fact that there's way in "heck" that Phil Fulmer will hire Hugh Freeze. You're getting Billy Napier or some other up-and-comer who looks exactly like Butch Jones did in 2012 or Pruitt did in 2017.
The collective IQ of this board has plummeted the past month. Are you all really too stupid to understand this?
So it's only whiny a holes that sabotage recruiting? It has zero to do with the product the coaches put on the field every week? InterestingThe economics improve every year the buyout falls.
But you're really just making the case for why you'll be stuck with Pruitt for at least another 2-3 years. This idea that he's going to be fired is a pipe dream. You're stuck with him. If the economics decline further, that just means you're stuck with him longer. Get used to it.
You can either continue to support the team. Or you can be a whiny a@$hole who sabotages our recruiting efforts. Those are the options. Firing Pruitt is not one of the options right now, cupcake.
So it's only whiny a holes that sabotage recruiting? It has zero to do with the product the coaches put on the field every week? Interesting
The economics improve every year the buyout falls.
But you're really just making the case for why you'll be stuck with Pruitt for at least another 2-3 years. This idea that he's going to be fired is a pipe dream. You're stuck with him. If the economics decline further, that just means you're stuck with him longer. Get used to it.
You can either continue to support the team. Or you can be a whiny a@$hole who sabotages our recruiting efforts. Those are the options. Firing Pruitt is not one of the options right now, cupcake.
Do you understand how debt works?
$20 million is the price tag. In a year where revenues plummeted (and may still be down next year). Add on top of that the fact that no top-tier coach in their right mind is coming here at the end of a Covid season. Also add on top of that the fact that there's way in "heck" that Phil Fulmer will hire Hugh Freeze. You're getting Billy Napier or some other up-and-comer who looks exactly like Butch Jones did in 2012 or Pruitt did in 2017.
The collective IQ of this board has plummeted the past month. Are you all really too stupid to understand this?
Yes. Nobody here is even close to as smart as you.Do you understand how debt works?
$20 million is the price tag. In a year where revenues plummeted (and may still be down next year). Add on top of that the fact that no top-tier coach in their right mind is coming here at the end of a Covid season. Also add on top of that the fact that there's way in "heck" that Phil Fulmer will hire Hugh Freeze. You're getting Billy Napier or some other up-and-comer who looks exactly like Butch Jones did in 2012 or Pruitt did in 2017.
The collective IQ of this board has plummeted the past month. Are you all really too stupid to understand this?
You mean the same Johnny Majors that went 5-6 during his 4th season and took about 5-7 years to turn UT back into an SEC contender, but who also eventually built the foundation for our national title team?