Our Replay Review Process

[roberthunter]

It has to catch up with the times in the off season. I love Barnes, but this is one area in which we are clearly deficient. I can't remember the last time we challenged anything. I vaguely remember one unsuccessful challenge at some point early in the season. Did we have a successful challenge all year?

I found it frustrating all year to have other teams use review ipads and get calls overturned on us while we did nothing. I'm not sure if he's afraid of losing time outs or what, but the goal imo should be to get at least one possession/basket back per game via challenge. Refs consistently make mistakes where you can steal a possession back. Other teams did it against us a lot. Those possessions during the middle of a game count too.

 

[SAPPER 5]

Doesn't matter, almost all the calls that could have helped us were UN reviewable in the first place. Funny how that worked out.

 

[roberthunter]

I'm not talking about this game in particular. Nothing was going to save us from that performance (but Michigan did have a successful challenge).

The aggregate is undeniable. We are not challenging calls. Other teams are successfully challenging calls against us. Somebody other than me can research the stats on this, but I guarantee you it's abysmal for us

 

[livefaith]

Refs don't make bad calls against us.

 

[Okie]

I'm not talking about this game in particular. Nothing was going to save us from that performance (but Michigan did have a successful challenge).

The aggregate is undeniable. We are not challenging calls. Other teams are successfully challenging calls against us. Somebody other than me can research the stats on this, but I guarantee you it's abysmal for us

Good job making the accusation and then pushing the research off on someone else. That sounds a lot like my boss. Hehe.

Seriously, though, I had never thought about this being a part of game strategy, but it sounds like something worth considering.