bluetickhound16
Message board folk hero
- Joined
- Dec 2, 2008
- Messages
- 4,904
- Likes
- 4
If you evaluate the next four games based solely off of a four year trailing average of talent on the roster, you would find that there are only 2 teams of those 4 that we actually have more talent than: Mississippi State and SCAR. MSU averages a recruiting class of 33rd using this analysis and SCAR averages 16 (UT 12.25ish). For further reference, BAMA averages 2nd and UGA 10th. Also understand that UT's average number has not been adjusted down due to the talent attrition from the 2009 class, but even if it is as low as 98th, we still average more talent than MSU.
Spurrier has shown a history of over-performing with his talent. That could more than make up for the apparent talent gap.
When you look at the numbers objectively, one can actually evaluate Dooley's performance based off of talent v. talent. If Dooley coaches just to his talent level, then UT goes 1-3 in that stretch. If Dooley can coach above the level of his talent and outcoach spurrier we go 2-2. Objectively, we shouldn't beat UGA nor Bama. If we lose to everyone we should plus MSU, I will start skewing towards the "Dooley can't coach this talent" crowd.
by this same analysis, we should not have won against UF (they average 5th best recruiting), and UF should go 7-1 in the sec (+/- 1 game). Time will tell.
I'd say the talent equation is a wash with USCe... Its just that they are strong where we are weak and vice versa...
As far as coaching goes... Somebody on this team (or several somebodies...) are going to have to take it out of the coaches hands as far as play in the field is concerned. Leadership by example is as contagious as having the team play poorly and "give up" or "quit" or whatever term one may wish to use.... I'm hoping we can have some LBE and win two of the next four games. Anything better is just asking too much right now...