you tell me,,how have we been looking against those SEC teams that have finished just a few spots higher in the recruiting rankings the past few years.
Dude. Take a step back for a minute. Now take a deep breath. .... OK?
Here:
Year Rank
2007 3 (32 players)
2008 35
2009 10
2010 9
2011 13
List the RS Seniors that contributed this year? (2007)
List the True Seniors that contributed this year? (2008)
List the RS Juniors that contributed this year? (2008)
List the True Juniors that contributed this year? (2009)
List the RS Sophmores that contributed this year? (2009)
List the True Sophmores that contributed this year?(2010)
List the RS Freshman that contributed this year? (2010)
List the True Freshman that contributed this year?(2011)
If you can do this, then you will understand the point of every rational poster on this board. Class rankings and stars mean jack once players hit the field, and in our case when they DON'T hit the field.
What does a 3rd, 35th, and 10th ranked class really mean when there is only a handful of players left that actually contribute of the
71 players that were signed those 3yrs?
When you can formulate a position that explains this to me then I will happily join your crusade.
There is a big difference between a team that has 20-30 players left of the 70 or so they signed compared to a team that has 5. This is what your seeing on the field. Our problem is not that we're finishing 10th and Bama, Florida, LSU, is finishing in the top 5. They actually retained their players, we did not. The guys they signed are still on their team where ours are at other schools, in the NFL, or out of football altogether.