How do people have Bob Stoops so high on their wish list? I think it's pretty clear that he is not all that interested in committing full time to another program. He's a big-time proven winner, I get it. But I would have serious doubts about him being in it for the long haul and not just coming back for a nice payday.
Chip Kelly - While Franklin has no real baggage, Kelly does as we all know; however he is a very solid proven winner, and has developed players better than prob any coach (that we could possibly get). His O talent would fit well with what we have right now. Also he could prob bring in some of the best assistants of anyone. Chip would prob be as high as 9 (on the chance of obtaining him); however Tennessee would have to act before seasons end or very soon after to land him. A&M will be looking at Chip hard, and they could act before we do; however I would expect he likes our situation and our being in the east much better.
Dan Mullen - Everyone knows this choice. He is a proven winner and a good developer. The only prob is he is already in the SEC, so no one really knows his up side. would we be better......certainly, but by how much. He would have and could get more talent ( than at MSU), and he would be in the east....so those look good, but would it be enough to make us 10+ year to year?
Kelly was the coach of the greatest flag football team in history - Oregon. The problem is flag football isn't played in the East... let alone the NCAA isn't exactly happy with him... whether he could even coach for a year or two might need to be litigated. You say he is a winner but he hasn't had a winning team since 2014. Is Uncle Rico football the kind of football you like to see? I would Chip's idea of football falls more into the realm of flag football.
Mullen is actually a SEC career loser, both at the SEC and SECW... from what I can gather he is basically last in wins in the SECW during his career. He is a solid coach but why would he want to leave unless the NCAA comes a knocking? He is making close to $5m a year and he doesn't have to win at MSU, generally. MSU fans are happy if he wins 5-8 games a year.
Mullen could make sense for a team, the problem is he is already either top 10 in salary or close to it.... he doesn't have to win where he is... so how much would he want... my guess $100m over 10 years or so.
Career Losers don't take Mississippi State to a #1 ranking for multiple weeks....
Yep. This team isn't losing because of any reason outside of Butch.
Right now Tennessee is sitting at where Florida was sitting right after Zook was fired. Packed full of players. Lacking a head coach.
Time to bring in the key stone and win some games...
circumstance has to at least be a consideration.That one did, 30-35 in the SEC... I think something like 14-30 in the SECW. MSU is happy he gets 5-8 wins a year, and they pay him close to top 10 in the country. LOL They just gave him an extension for going 6-7 with losses to South Alabama at home, BYU, and Kentucky. He probably has the greatest football gig in the country, the pay him super great and he doesn't have to win. Unless the NCAA comes a knocking, which is a possibility at this stage... I would think logic is... unless someone offers him $7-10m a year... why bother. An NCAA investigation certainly could change things... which is why Chip left town.
As I discussed most of this seems unrealistic, as LSU figured out last year. There is no reason for any of these guys to even consider anything as they are getting great money... so they are in the driver's seat... not UT. Let me say this.... a school willing to go the $100-150m route for a coach that has a losing conference record... well, they are a ton more confident than I would be. Industrial size comes to mind.
circumstance has to at least be a consideration.
could it be possible that it's that he's at MSU and in the West are more of a contributor to that record than "he's a loser coach"?
not saying i want to throw a bank vault at mullen.
but everything's relative. what they may be happy with there, could translate in to something we'd be happy with here, given the change in circumstances.
Bob Stoops
Chip KellyDan Mullen
Bobby Petrino
Scott Satterfield
Justin Fuente
Mike MacIntyre
Mike Gundy
Kyle Whittingham
Pat Fitzgerald
Hugh Freeze
Dana Holgerson
Larry Fedora
Pat Narduzzi
Rich Rodriguez
Kevin Sumlin
PJ Fleck
Troy Calhoun
The list goes on and on. Any big names I'm missing? Again, I'm not saying we should fire Butch. I'm just wondering if there's ever been a better time to be in the market for a head coach. I do think we'll have a strong season and this will be a moot point, but I'm always thinking "what if"
I was curious about Mullen's record vs east opponents and Alabama, since those are the teams we'd be playing if he coached here.
He is 14-5 against the east (73.6%) and has never beaten Alabama, going 0-8.
That puts Mullen at 14-13 (51.8%).
I'm not saying I'm for him or against him ... I'm just saying.
Dan Mullen or Chip Kelly would be the first that we should pursue. Right now it is Butch and he has a chance to coach himself out of a job by the end of the season. He is off to a good start with Tech and Florida even though we won one of the games.
I just hope there's some type of research/homework/interest seeking/agent phone calls going NOW. The last we need is to pull another Dave Hart and start a search AFTER we fire (which is inevitable) the current coach.