W.TN.Orange Blood
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2012
- Messages
- 143,006
- Likes
- 381,413
I was referring to last year’s RB, Dylan Sampson. When writer’s voted, they didn’t know about issues with Boo. He’s likely TN’s best player. Unbelievable that’s he’s probably lost as well….3 high schools should have been a red flag.Stud tailback? Pretty sure Boo was a DB and PR. Hell of a loss but still…
Of course, I may have missed someone.
Cowboys were in NFC East since the Merger. Main reason they stayed in East was due to the rivalries with the Eagles,Giants and Commanders. St.Louis was part of NFC East in the early years of the Merger.AFC South has two of the most recent expansion teams unless you want to count the Browns and the division wasn’t even created until 2002. Indianapolis isn’t even a southern team. The Bengals are more southern in relation to Tennessee, the Saints and Panthers are more eastern than the Cowboys. To add to this, are we going to make Texas a southern state now since they are in the SEC? Or are we going to consider those Californian teams southern because they are in the ACC and that “Midwestern” conference. Geography in sports has never felt more irrelevant than it is now.
I wished the Titans had gotten to stay in the same division as the Ravens and Steelers. Those games were always rough and tumble. Instead they threw us in with the Colts and said “bring these expansion teams along with you.”Cowboys were in NFC East since the Merger. Main reason they stayed in East was due to the rivalries with the Eagles,Giants and Commanders. St.Louis was part of NFC East in the early years of the Merger.
I never thought they were offensive. Just like they tried to cancel the Braves and “The Chop”. Braves actually have proof they work with Native American tribes and help draw attention to them. Many people in the region, including myself have Native American ancestors. But those idiots trying to cancel everyone wouldn’t know that because they never do any research.I don't know why the word indians is offensive? That's what they were.
Can you imagine the Dallas white men?![]()
Well as a paid NA, I find both the Braves and Chiefs names offensive until we get the Redskins name back.I never thought they were offensive. Just like they tried to cancel the Braves and “The Chop”. Braves actually have proof they work with Native American tribes and help draw attention to them. Many people in the region, including myself have Native American ancestors. But those idiots trying to cancel everyone wouldn’t know that because they never do any research.
I think it is hilarious that nobody found Redskins offensive after 80+ years or Indians after 100+ years and then all the sudden “everyone” is up in arms about those names. Both of those franchises should have said “F off. It’s our team name and it’s been that way longer than you have been alive so if you don’t like it then go on somewhere else.” They weren’t breaking any laws having those nicknames.Well as a paid NA, I find both the Braves and Chiefs names offensive until we get the Redskins name back.
No one cares about Cleveland.
The "Indians" are fighting now to have them change the name back to Redskins.I think it is hilarious that nobody found Redskins offensive after 80+ years or Indians after 100+ years and then all the sudden “everyone” is up in arms about those names. Both of those franchises should have said “F off. It’s our team name and it’s been that way longer than you have been alive so if you don’t like it then go on somewhere else.” They weren’t breaking any laws having those nicknames.