Serrano is so tone deaf. This fan base doesn't want to hear "if you take away the 0-6 start in SEC play, we've been pretty good" kind of talk. At least I don't want to hear it.
Sure, Dave, if you take away the first 6 years of your career at UT things haven't been so bad.
It is accurate, and it should be considered along with the context of the entire six year run and the context of this season.
It's improvement in two ways. The team has improved during the season, and this improvement, if sustained, is different from past seasons when we tailed off or nose dived in the final month.
Is it enough? To have a realistic shot at an at large bid, an SEC team needs to win its home series, avoid being swept on the road, and pick up a couple wins to offset all or most home series losses and road sweeps.
Since the 0-6 start, we lost a home series to Georgia and offset it with a road series win at Florida. Then we lost a home series to Auburn and held serve by avoiding sweeps at aTm and Vanderbilt.
We have to start winning some series at home. We have two home series left. We should win or sweep the Mizzou series. If we win the Arkansas series and steal a game at UK, Serrano will have a pretty good talking point for his postseason meetings.
Should it be enough? If we win 5 of the last 9 SEC games and end up 11-12 over the final 8 conference weekends, that would represent an improvement that would make me think harder about the coaching issue.
Will it be enough for the AD? I have no idea.
Let's see them win those games and find out.