triad280
BLEEDING Orange
- Joined
- Mar 1, 2009
- Messages
- 3,961
- Likes
- 2,151
Yeah my dad has had season tickets back to Stokely and he sold popcorn when they played at Alumni Gym before Stokely. My point though is all the unsold tickets to the basketball games makes a statement. It says we still as UT fans will go see a Good product so we haven't quit on the University. We have had a leave from Neyland till a change is made and that is why many are boycotting the football games.
I love the Atomic/Daytona Sunset Orange, and black as well. I've had 4 black Corvettes, lol. Currently have a '75 convertible (maroon) with an LS1/6 speed swap, and my wife drives an '08 convertible, black on tan with a tan top...Ls3 with a 6 speed. Car is a beast.
Help me understand something.
How does separating the ad and the academic side of things to be independent of each other help admitting theses kids that are NCAA eligible but haven't been admittable before under cheek????
I think I have read on here that the issue is separating the two and I don't understand how that helps unless cheek gives up his high standard approach to addmittance
Best game I've ever been to at TBA was against FL. 9pm tip, I sit in the upper bowl and had to stand the whole time. Amazing atmosphere. That was about 3 or 4 years ago.
Yeah on Super Tuesday or whatever ESPN calls it. My point is basketball can make a stamp on AD on athletics overall. I remember the loudest I have ever heard TBA including the first time bernard King came back was an eruption when Lane Kiffin was here and Eric Berry was introduced during a tv timeout and TBA exploded.
Yeah on Super Tuesday or whatever ESPN calls it. My point is basketball can make a stamp on AD on athletics overall. I remember the loudest I have ever heard TBA including the first time bernard King came back was an eruption when Lane Kiffin was here and Eric Berry was introduced during a tv timeout and TBA exploded.
Cheek would have no say in who gets hired, and they would probably come to some sort of compromise
on admission standards,just guessing on that part though...I mean you have a 5 star cant miss prospect that would be worth millions of dollars to the university but scores a 20 on his ACT,not admitting him is just bad business and stupid...
Cheek would have no say in who gets hired, and they would probably come to some sort of compromise
on admission standards,just guessing on that part though...I mean you have a 5 star cant miss prospect that would be worth millions of dollars to the university but scores a 20 on his ACT,not admitting him is just bad business and stupid...
It may be bad business, but athletes must be admitted as students under the same or similar requirements as normal students. As I understand the problem to be, UT's standards are somewhat more stringent than other SEC universities which gives other schools an inherent competitive advantage.
I think the argument is that we should have the sane standards as everyone else.
We have a maybe, weak one at that, of Gruden not being successful or a sure thing of ineptitude and loss of revenue with Dooley.Like I have said in an earlier post, we cannot afford to keep Dooley and we cannot afford to get rid of him! As for Gruden, what if we paid Gruden the 5million and he turned out to be another expensive......DUD????
I agree that is stupid but what does separating the two help with that????
Cheek giving the athletic programs some academic exceptions doesn't require them separating as far as I understand the inter workings of a university.
