Sandvol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2010
- Messages
- 12,785
- Likes
- 3,723
You're all over the place. Are you drunk? But Doc and others brought up the drought because that is all you have been doing that last six months. Stop being evasive. You've been posting California and wildfire posts in this thread for months as if has had anything at all to do with this thread. Doc posted one too. I posted a chart of the historical Western Mega Droughts so Doc would understand that this drought is nothing new. It isn't hard to understand Bart.Again, irrelevant. You responded to Docs post, not to mine. Docs post was not in response to one of mine. Stop digging and move on.
Bro, do you even science? El Nino is already here. Predicting how it will impact weather patterns is what scientists do.
You are either drunk or stoned. You are the one who brought up what effect El Nino might have in 2016. Not me. I said no one knows what effect it will have or if it will even be here-it's the weather. I didn't say it wasn't here. We can't predict the future. But, maybe you can.
Yes, after the orbital decay ADJUSTMENT (*snicker*) in 1998 the trend was +0.07. Fast-forward to this millenium (also in the wiki):
Im not sure what it is in version 6.0, but judging by the graph, its still a lot closer to +0.15 than +0.04. So could you please explain how a 0.3 C temperature rise since 2000 is a pause in this trend?
Could you explain how the 0.07/decade rise equates to a 0.3C rise since 2000? But, that 0.07 decade rise was calculated for data prior to 2000. Now that we have a pause we should see that 0.07 number decrease. Or is that too logical for you?
NOAA before 2000 didn't know what the hell they were doing in those ancient times? Now they need to "adjust" all that data. Yeah right.
