Official Election Day Meltdown Thread

#401
#401
SpaceCoastVol said:
Having trouble sleeping tonight, so I got up and have been watching videos of the libs crying and screaming. It is actually pretty damned hilarious and pathetic at the same time. No, maybe disturbing if you really think about it.

And yes I am a little late to this particular party, but I like this Alex Jones fella. Some of his stuff is a riot (the good kind of riot)
Click to expand...

Yeah lefties are morons. 2 at work have called out sick so they could drink themselves into a coma. One minority asked if he could hide at my house when the race war starts. :eek:lol:
 
#402
#402
BowlBrother85 said:
You are wrong. You just can't make direct threats to the president. If she had said, "It's time for me to assassinate the president." then she would be getting a visit from the Secret Service and be in a lot of trouble - that's not what she said, however. Just like in Rankin v McPherson, this is political commentary... and it did involve the advocacy of the assassination of President Reagan. Ardith McPherson was caught specifically saying that she hoped Reagan would be assassinated.

Edit: She still may get a visit from the Secret Service anyway. They don't play games with this type of thing.
Click to expand...

She will get a visit along with a bunch of these other idiots...

...go on youtube and do a search. There are a lot of these visits on there.
 
#404
#404
The party of "love trumps hate"

What a joke

These people are mentally disabled. Drug-addled degenerates of the highest order.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#407
#407
It's about everyone else except Hillary who ran on a campaign of "I'm not Trump."

However, LG will lap it up.

Clinton campaign blames James Comey for election loss - AOL News

The Hillary Clinton campaign pinned blame on FBI Director James Comey for its stunning election night loss to Donald Trump.

Navin Nayak, the director of opinion research on the campaign, sent an email to senior staff Thursday evening outlining what it believed were the reasons for its loss. The email, which was first reported by Politico, was confirmed to Business Insider by a Clinton campaign staffer.

Additionally, Nayak pointed to anger at global institutions, a desire for change after a two-term Democratic president, the challenges of reassembling President Barack Obama's voting coalition, and the "unprecedented task" of electing the nation's first female president as hurdles to the campaign's success.

Nayak also suggested some blame lay at the feet of Green Party nominee Jill Stein, whose 130,000 votes in three key swing states were an "important reminder of the influence of 3rd party votes."
Click to expand...
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#408
#408
Septic said:
I'm no constitutional scholar but I'm pretty sure you can't go around talking about assassinating the president, that's got to be a felony.

I'd wager that 1a doesn't cover that.

Rankin vs McPherson seems to apply only to government officials and specifically excludes threats to the prez.
Click to expand...

I remember some kid in my high school posted on MySpace that he was going to kill GWB on a field trip. Law enforcement came to the school and he was gone for the rest of the year.
 
#409
#409
Has anyone else thought about what Trump's first State of the Union address will look like in 3 months? He really doesn't have much experience in making speeches to crowds that aren't 100% behind him (aside from some occasional hecklers) and where he is expected to provide specific details on issues and policies. The reality is that even at his campaign rallies, he mostly just spoke in generalities and attacked the Clintons and Barack Obama. He looks at ease while attacking his critics and opponents but not as much when promoting his agenda. He is also a very inarticulate speaker. He employs a somber cadence while often repeating phrases at the end of each sentence. He also has a limited vocabulary (see his constant use of 'disaster') and frequently engages in hyperbole even when it's inappropriate. He has never looked comfortable trying to stay on message while reading from a teleprompter and will often bounce around from topic to topic in an unfocused and rambling manner. When scrutinized in transcript form, some (but not all) of his speeches are incoherent. So, what do you think? Does he make a laughingstock out of the United States government that night... or can he actually pull this off and inspire some confidence in his detractors?
 
#410
#410
BowlBrother85 said:
Has anyone else thought about what Trump's first State of the Union address will look like in 3 months? He really doesn't have much experience in making speeches to crowds that aren't 100% behind him (aside from some occasional hecklers) and where he is expected to provide specific details on issues and policies. The reality is that even at his campaign rallies, he mostly just spoke in generalities and attacked the Clintons and Barack Obama. He looks at ease while attacking his critics and opponents but not as much when promoting his agenda. He is also a very inarticulate speaker. He employs a somber cadence while often repeating phrases at the end of each sentence. He also has a limited vocabulary (see his constant use of 'disaster') and frequently engages in hyperbole even when it's inappropriate. He has never looked comfortable trying to stay on message while reading from a teleprompter and will often bounce around from topic to topic in an unfocused and rambling manner. When scrutinized in transcript form, some (but not all) of his speeches are incoherent. So, what do you think? Does he make a laughingstock out of the United States government that night... or can he actually pull this off and inspire some confidence in his detractors?
Click to expand...
Yet, he won! Ha ha hah. Bwaahhh.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#411
#411
1972 Grad said:
Yet, he won! Ha ha hah. Bwaahhh.
Click to expand...

Right but I notice you didn't answer the question which was posed at the end. Trump will have to do much more at the State of the Union then hurl immature and petty insults (Crooked Hillary, Lyin' Ted and Low Energy Jeb) and throw red meat to his base (in unspecific and general terms, of course). Personally, I don't think he has a full command of the issues (especially foreign policy) and is in over his head. The State of the Union could be a place where that first becomes evident. If anyone disagrees, please explain why I'm wrong.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#413
#413
BowlBrother85 said:
Right but I notice you didn't answer the question which was posed at the end. Trump will have to do much more at the State of the Union then hurl immature and petty insults (Crooked Hillary, Lyin' Ted and Low Energy Jeb) and throw red meat to his base (in unspecific and general terms, of course). Personally, I don't think he has a full command of the issues (especially foreign policy) and is in over his head. The State of the Union could be a place where that first becomes evident. If anyone disagrees, please explain why I'm wrong.
Click to expand...
You, like many did with Reagan and Bush 2, continue to underestimate people who communicate on a level that most understand. These people, Trump included, are not dumbasses. They can use big words if they feel the need.

Obama couldn't say sh!t , and wound up a stuttering, blithering idiot, when his teleprompter went cold, yet people like you think he is intelligent, because he reads a good speech. Trump can speak off the cuff, and communicate with people.
 
#414
#414
1972 Grad said:
You, like many did with Reagan and Bush 2, continue to underestimate people who communicate on a level that most understand. These people, Trump included, are not dumbasses. They can use big words if they feel the need.

Obama couldn't say sh!t , and wound up a stuttering, blithering idiot, when his teleprompter went cold, yet people like you think he is intelligent, because he reads a good speech. Trump can speak off the cuff, and communicate with people.
Click to expand...

You really can't compare Reagan or George W Bush to Trump. Reagan was very much a politician by 1980. He had been Governor of California for 8 years and had run for President in 1976. He had demonstrated his knowledge of the pertinent issues of the day and he was as strong an orator as we have ever had as President. GWB had been Governor of Texas and although he was inarticulate (at times), he was at least Presidential in his behavior - which Trump has never been. If by 'communicate' with people you mean Trump can throw red meat to his base of support (white men without college degrees) then I agree with you. He definitely speaks to the insecurities of the uneducated white man. He just does so without specifics. He is all about using pejorative terms against his critics and generalities.
 
#419
#419
golfballs said:
The FBI debacle was her own fault. Not Comey's
Click to expand...

This.


Doesn't anyone else assume that the poster look like their avatars? golf balls is one of my favorites because my jacked up mind has a high pitched black guy with boogity eyes yelling these posts.
 
#423
#423
BowlBrother85 said:
You really can't compare Reagan or George W Bush to Trump. Reagan was very much a politician by 1980. He had been Governor of California for 8 years and had run for President in 1976. He had demonstrated his knowledge of the pertinent issues of the day and he was as strong an orator as we have ever had as President. GWB had been Governor of Texas and although he was inarticulate (at times), he was at least Presidential in his behavior - which Trump has never been. If by 'communicate' with people you mean Trump can throw red meat to his base of support (white men without college degrees) then I agree with you. He definitely speaks to the insecurities of the uneducated white man. He just does so without specifics. He is all about using pejorative terms against his critics and generalities.
Click to expand...
I compared elitists' (like yourself) opinions of Reagan, Trump, and Bush 2. I am well aware of the careers of all 3 men, since I am 67 years old and voted for all of them.

I don't share your concerns about Trump's first State of the Union address. It's not like anyone really pays any attention to one anyway. I can't remember a State of the Union speech that ever made a difference in much of anything.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top