Official Bubble Watch Thread

#505
#505
BTO

I know you use realtimerpi and for the rpi up to date rankings warrennolan the site I look at a lot is always the same or within 1. However in looking at projections
Warrennolan has us with an rpi of 34 at 17-13. That is very different from realtime.
It also shows a sos of 3 as predicted

Do you think the site I frequent is bogus?

RPI is '' for 2016-2017 Men's College Basketball - WarrenNolan.com
 
#506
#506
Is there a way to find SOS before an NIT was played?

I am looking at Stanford in 2015 that was left out. They won the NIT, finished with a 27 SOS, has a 19-13 record on selection Sunday and were snubbed with a 53 rpi.

What was their SOS before playing the NIT?
 
#507
#507
BruinVol said:
Is there a way to find SOS before an NIT was played?

I am looking at Stanford in 2015 that was left out. They won the NIT, finished with a 27 SOS, has a 19-13 record on selection Sunday and were snubbed with a 53 rpi.

What was their SOS before playing the NIT?
Click to expand...

I believe the final RPI rankings are after conference tournaments but before the NCAAT and NIT. Don't believe they are included.
 
#508
#508
VolGee4 said:
I believe the final RPI rankings are after conference tournaments but before the NCAAT and NIT. Don't believe they are included.
Click to expand...

Pretty sure that's not right. If that was the case Stanford was left out with a 34 rpi and 27 SOS.

If I am reading the chart correctly their rpi was 59 after their conference tourney.
 
#509
#509
#510
#510
BruinVol said:
Pretty sure that's not right. If that was the case Stanford was left out with a 34 rpi and 27 SOS.

If I am reading the chart correctly their rpi was 59 after their conference tourney.
Click to expand...

All I can tell you is that if you go back and look at past years at real time RPI, they do not list the records including the tournament. Villanova is listed at 29-5 last year when they finished 35-5. They also bold the teams who make the tournament, so you can easily see the top ranked teams who didn't make it.
 
#511
#511
VolGee4 said:
All I can tell you is that if you go back and look at past years at real time RPI, they do not list the records including the tournament. Villanova is listed at 29-5 last year when they finished 35-5. They also bold the teams who make the tournament, so you can easily see the top ranked teams who didn't make it.
Click to expand...

Thanks.

Do you have to have an account to view those?
 
#512
#512
#514
#514
VolGee4 said:
I only use Warren Nolan for baseball. Looks like he does include postseason. Real Time RPI had Stanford's final ranking at 59 that year.
Click to expand...

Thanks. Yes I am a college baseball fan and that is why I like the site.

Appreciate you.
 
#516
#516
Looks like Cuonzo and Cal will be in the tourney again this year...they are playing good ball right now and should get to 20 wins


Men's Basketball - California Golden Bears (2016-2017)

RPI Rank: 46*** SOS Rank: 48 *** Record: 16-6 (7-3)
 
#517
#517
BruinVol said:
BTO

I know you use realtimerpi and for the rpi up to date rankings warrennolan the site I look at a lot is always the same or within 1. However in looking at projections
Warrennolan has us with an rpi of 34 at 17-13. That is very different from realtime.
It also shows a sos of 3 as predicted

Do you think the site I frequent is bogus?

RPI is '' for 2016-2017 Men's College Basketball - WarrenNolan.com
Click to expand...

I use rpiforecast, have been using them for years and hey always have proved to be very close to accurate so I've continued using them, not sure on the site you're using.
 
#518
#518
BruinVol said:
Is there a way to find SOS before an NIT was played?

I am looking at Stanford in 2015 that was left out. They won the NIT, finished with a 27 SOS, has a 19-13 record on selection Sunday and were snubbed with a 53 rpi.

What was their SOS before playing the NIT?
Click to expand...

this site has Stanford's RPI at 59 on selection Sunday...

https://www.teamrankings.com/ncb/rpi/?date=2015-03-15

Not sure on SOS
 
#519
#519
bleedingTNorange said:
I use rpiforecast, have been using them for years and hey always have proved to be very close to accurate so I've continued using them, not sure on the site you're using.
Click to expand...

Thanks. Pretty big discrepancy. I hope mine is right as they seem to love the Vols rpi staying in the 30s with 5 more wins
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement



Back
Top