volinbham
VN GURU
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2004
- Messages
- 70,107
- Likes
- 63,530
Watching the Golf Channel last night they also thought the comments about Stevie were odd at best. One guy said that Tiger doesn't have a lot of friends left at this point so he should be a little more careful about what he says about his caddie!
Just stupid. He has friends, my goodness. Stevie had no clue about Tiger's infidelities because they do not hang out away from the course, remember?
Were the fools honestly insinuating that nobody is going to pick up that bag and make 7 figures?
Posted via VolNation Mobile
I think you missed bham's, or Golf Channel's, point, which is a good one. In the past, if Tiger went all sideways, he had a support system to help him keep things in the fairway. Now, his father is gone. His wife is gone. His coach is gone. Stevie is left. I think I might be a little careful about alienating him until the system is rebuilt.
Go check what phil said about his putt on 14 and get back to me.
Tiger always says "we" in good times and bad.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Speaking of #14, fair or unfair hole ? good or bad hole for a Major ?
I'm a little torn on this one, I think birdies and pars should be much harder to come by in the Majors especially the Opens, and I firmly believe a premium should be put on shotmaking but #14 this year came a little close to crossing the line, when you've got more bogeys and almost as many double bogeys or worse as you do pars on a par 5 on Sun. that's pushing the limits.
What do you all think ?
It and 17 were absurd with the greens that hard. 17 was probably more ridiculous for the last two rounds.
7 was playing 92 yards downhill, down wind and every single player hit L wedge 30 feet left and it bounced to the back of the green.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
I think it's goofy golf. I just don't like what the USGA continually does to golf courses in the name of creating a tournament where Par wins.
I went back and watched Phil's presser and yes, sounded like he was indirectly blaming the green for his missed putt on #14 which may or may not be the case, pretty weak on his part regardless, but they were speaking specifically about #14 which hardly equates to blaming his tourney misfortunes on the greens, he specifically said "I didn't get it done" but again if and when he starts blaming lackluster play on something or somebody else, I won't have any problem calling him out on it.
Your last sentence couldn't be further from the truth.
Name me any specific time or times before Sun. that Tiger has mentioned Steve Williams by name in reference to bad calls on shooting at pins or club selection, could be that he has but I or anyone else so far can't recall it, maybe you can help us out here. Go back and watch Tiger's presser after his 66 on Sat. I did, you'll hear a ton of I's but not even 1 we.
I think my issue with it is that the screwy setups tend to produce some "fluke" winners. It's more a version of Survivor than a golf tournament. It's next to impossible for anyone to make a charge on a course like that.Why ?
It's all in what you like I suppose and I certainly don't begrudge anyones opinion on it but I personally like for the Majors to test the best players in the world against par, IMO in usually brings the very best all around players to the top of the leaderboards by Sun.
I don't have anything and don't really care to look it up. Not worth arguing over because I, nor anyone else, can spin Tiger into anything other than what he is, anymore. A good golfer, less than acceptable person.
I don't necessarily think he was throwing him under the bus, but he was frustrated and most people tend to look for someone or something to blame. If he was given bad information from his caddy, should he not be frustrated by it? I get the whole don't make it public, and I agree
Posted via VolNation Mobile
I heard the Golf Channel guys ripping Tiger for not being more aggressive and saying that a guy like Greg Norman would have repeatedly fired at pins . . . and I'm thinking to myself "That's exactly why Greg Norman never won a US Open."
I think my issue with it is that the screwy setups tend to produce some "fluke" winners. It's more a version of Survivor than a golf tournament. It's next to impossible for anyone to make a charge on a course like that.
I heard the Golf Channel guys ripping Tiger for not being more aggressive and saying that a guy like Greg Norman would have repeatedly fired at pins . . . and I'm thinking to myself "That's exactly why Greg Norman never won a US Open."
I think my issue with it is that the screwy setups tend to produce some "fluke" winners. It's more a version of Survivor than a golf tournament. It's next to impossible for anyone to make a charge on a course like that.
I heard the Golf Channel guys ripping Tiger for not being more aggressive and saying that a guy like Greg Norman would have repeatedly fired at pins . . . and I'm thinking to myself "That's exactly why Greg Norman never won a US Open."
Why ?
It's all in what you like I suppose and I certainly don't begrudge anyones opinion on it but I personally like for the Majors to test the best players in the world against par, IMO in usually brings the very best all around players to the top of the leaderboards by Sun.
Really ? I think that's pretty rare for the majors and big tourneys, I can't think of many.
Craig Perks at The Players
Rich Beem at The PGA
Shawn Micheel at The PGA
There's bound to be a few more but I can't think of any, it's always seemed to me that the tough course setups at the Majors usually bring the cream to the top, hence the relatively short list of Major winners and extremely short list of multiple Major winners.
I agree 100%. The USGA goes way too far IMO trying to dictate what the winning number will be. The result is that it takes the Driver out of play, sucks the aggression out of the players and creates a few too many pot luck winners that happen to putt the eyes out of it that week like Andy North, Scott Simpson, Steve Jones, Lee Janzen, Michael Campbell, Geoff Oglivy . . . and Grahme McDowell.I think that is fine, so long as it doesn't infringe on what I think should be the main goal--testing the best players against each other. I do think that gets lost in the USGA's quest to protect par.
If you hit a good shot, you should be in good shape. If you put a putt on the right line with good speed, it should have a chance to go in. In the name of difficulty, the Open often introduces unpredictability, where good shots wind up casuing doubles and good putts wind up in the fairway. And on top of that, because players know this, they play differently.
That isn't good golf, and that isn't what our national championship is supposed to be, IMHO.
Anyone played Pebble? I played once, scenery was nice but didn't care for the layout. Too much hype probably led to my disappointment. (or the stiff green fee) I like T. Pines better.
Posted via VolNation Mobile