Obama's Nuclear Iran

#129
#129
Grand Vol said:
Like most things on here, you likely don't have the first clue in what you're talking about here.
Click to expand...

Considering the fact that he just stated that Iran has never threatened Israel, I'd say you are 100% correct. What's even more scarey is that he is a teacher.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#130
#130
Vol8188 said:
How many crime have been committed by men with hand grenades? Should they be legal?
Click to expand...

You're not that slick. I know the type of thinking that you have and you avoid answering the question by posing a question of your own. It's called verbal judo (or written as it would be) by taking the question of the person you're dealing with and flipping it on them.

You tend to do it quite a bit and you think it makes you look smarter. But all it means is you're trying to deflect the situation back to me and put me in a corner. And it's not working as it means you have no answer for the question at hand. Now either you answer my original question or admit you don't know.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 8 people
#133
#133
theFallGuy said:
Considering the fact that he just stated that Iran has never threatened Israel, I'd say you are 100% correct. What's even more scarey is that he is a teacher.
Click to expand...

He also didn't have a clue as to how Israel gained independence.
 
#136
#136
Grand Vol said:
You're not that slick. I know the type of thinking that you have and you avoid answering the question by posing a question of your own. It's called verbal judo (or written as it would be) by taking the question of the person you're dealing with and flipping it on them.

You tend to do it quite a bit and you think it makes you look smarter. But all it means is you're trying to deflect the situation back to me and put me in a corner. And it's not working as it means you have no answer for the question at hand. Now either you answer my original question or admit you don't know.
Click to expand...

It's not verbal judo or a deflection. I'm just saying your negative correlation between automatic weapons and crime is the same as the negative correlation between hand grenades and crime.

It's a simple comparision that anyone with a 2nd grade comparision should be able to understand. Just because there's not a lot crimes committed by people with hand grenades, does not mean we should legalize the sale of hand grenades to civilians.
 
#137
#137
Vol8188 said:
It's not verbal judo or a deflection. I'm just saying your negative correlation between automatic weapons and crime is the same as the negative correlation between hand grenades and crime.

It's a simple comparision that anyone with a 2nd grade comparision should be able to understand. Just because there's not a lot crimes committed by people with hand grenades, does not mean we should legalize the sale of hand grenades to civilians.
Click to expand...

So...

Can you tell me the exact number?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#138
#138
Vol8188 said:
Just like nuclear arms and hand grenades, it seems unnecessary
Click to expand...

Who are you to decide what's necessary? That right there is why liberalism is a mental disease. You "think" you know better. You "think" you are wiser than anybody else. You "think" you know better how to spend the money that you steal from people who actually work to earn it. Think is in quotes because you actually don't.

I have a squirrel problem full auto seems to take care of it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#141
#141
Vol8188 said:
Just because there's not a lot crimes committed by people with hand grenades, does not mean we should legalize the sale of hand grenades to civilians.
Click to expand...

Why not? Because you are afraid of them? More stoned people kill people driving than people with hand grenades, but you love the idea of making drugs legal.
 
#143
#143
SpaceCoastVol said:
Why not? Because you are afraid of them? More stoned people kill people driving than people with hand grenades, but you love the idea of making drugs legal.
Click to expand...

Do you see the issue with your logic here? No one is supporting driving under the influence.
 
#146
#146
SpaceCoastVol said:
Who are you to decide what's necessary? That right there is why liberalism is a mental disease. You "think" you know better. You "think" you are wiser than anybody else. You "think" you know better how to spend the money that you steal from people who actually work to earn it. Think is in quotes because you actually don't.

I have a squirrel problem full auto seems to take care of it.
Click to expand...

So you feel the right to bare arms should include nuclear weapons?

And haven't you and many others been argument this entire time that Iran doesn't need nuclear weapons. Who are you to tell them what to do? I guess conservatism is a disease by your definition
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#149
#149
Vol8188 said:
What legal uses are there?
Click to expand...

Deflection. If it is my right to own one, and I believe it is, then as long as I do not use it to kill someone or destroy their property, then what I do with it is MY business. Maybe I want to remove an old tree stump. Maybe I just want to watch it blow up an old TV... because it's fun. I shot an AR15 recently with a 30 shot magazine. I don't NEED a 30 shot magazine (tests have proven that you can change 15 round magazines with little loss of time)... but I WANT one... because it is fun to shoot. You get your kicks being a doper. I get mine target shooting.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top