Obama at the UN..WOW

#26
#26
volmaverick said:
He doesn't mention terrorism by radical Islamists...he still blames the film

Says the future must not belong to people that slander Islam

Says Muslims have suffered the most

Wow just sick!

I swear it sounds like the leader of Iran talking!

How about those who kill in the name of Islam, what future do they have according to you, Mr. Obama?
Click to expand...

Is this not true? Their own governments oppress them, while we drone bomb innocent women and children.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#28
#28
volmaverick said:
LOL

there own religion and way of life oppress them!


we drone bomb innocent women and children...LOL

Aw yes the evil Americans
Click to expand...

I call it evil. What else do you call the drone bombing of innocent women and children? These aren't laughing matters. These are serious issues.
 
#33
#33
volmaverick said:
My God

"innocent" people didnt harbour Nazis in WWII but they still needed sought out by any means
Click to expand...

What is your evidence that collateral damage is a necessary evil?

This is what a survivor of a drone bomb looks like:

drones.png


That's enough to make me hate the people responsible.
 
#34
#34
Vol Main said:
Yes, he does need your help, but you're not helping. Did you even read the speech before making that negative comment about it? Apparently, you did not. The trashy video is a topic of protest all over the world; our nation is misrepresented by it, people hate us because of it, and you think it's ridiculous for President Obama to include it in his speech at the UN. Duh. How could you think that? Didn't you think that just to reinforce your existing prejudice against the President? What other reason could you have...knee-jerk negativity? Why didn't you compliment the President for his defense of free speech at the UN? Well...? Why didn't you?
Click to expand...

he said this

There is no video that justifies an attack on an Embassy.
Click to expand...
what do you think he meant by that?

as for the free speech, I called for him to mention it when the attack happened and the vid was blamed. About damn time he realizes our Constitution means something.

VOLatile said:
This statement could easily be applied to the OP, but not to PJ... :hi:
Click to expand...

appreciate it
 
#38
#38
Guess what

If there leaders stopped harbouring terrorist and the people stopped turning them into martyrs/hero The drone bombing would not be needed
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#39
#39
volmaverick said:
Guess you were against bombing Germany in WWII
Click to expand...

The parts where innocents were killed.

I'm against our involvement in WWII. I'm pretty sure if we stay neutral we don't get attacked at Pearl Harbor. Sure we helped defeat the Nazis, but only to leave eastern Europe to the Communists. Not really sure that was a good outcome.
 
#40
#40
n_huffhines said:
The parts where innocents were killed.

I'm against our involvement in WWII. I'm pretty sure if we stay neutral we don't get attacked at Pearl Harbor. Sure we helped defeat the Nazis, but only to leave eastern Europe to the Communists. Not really sure that was a good outcome.
Click to expand...


pretty sure??..LOL

Germany declared war on us!!!!

Also our Declaration of War upon Germany was AFTER the Japan attack!!!
 
#41
#41
No kidding? I don't need a history lesson.

Germany told Japan not to attack us until we vacated the Philippines. Japan couldn’t wait because they needed our oil, rubber, and steel which we refused to trade with them because we were not neutral. Japan attacked us against Germany’s wishes, and Germany had no choice but to declare war on us along with their ally.

Like I said, I’m “pretty” sure if we stay neutral we don’t get involved. If I said I’m 100% sure, then I would be an idiot. You can’t know that an alternate history would have served us better with 100% certainty. You strike me as somebody who is 100% certain that our involvement in WWII was a good thing.
 
#42
#42
Vol Main said:
Frankly, no cheap shot intended, I think you intended to misrepresent the speech in a bad way for the purpose of falsely demeaning our President. That's not good.
Click to expand...

Why? He's a piece of ****.

He's not royalty and I'm sick of the expectation that we have treat him as such.

We are Americans and we don't have to like him, we don't have to respect him, we can criticize him using whatever justification we want. The only thing we can't do is say we wish harm to come to him.
 
#47
#47
It's their country, it's their ****ing responsibility to rat out the scum living amongst them. Otherwise they can face the brutal consequences.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top