MyBloodRunnethOrange
Jesus is Lord
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2004
- Messages
- 116,833
- Likes
- 24,376
that's still the question isn't it? why so vanilla?If we had coaches who had the least bit of creativity, they'd be dialing up lots of slants, screens, and hitches to compensate for the lack of pass blocking. This staff is not even trying to put us in the best position to win tough games. Maybe once we get past Bama they'll open it up some but for now I think they are content with run-run-pass-punt.
I was probably harsh in my words. I really do wonder if they're just trying to survive the gauntlet with a serviceable roster so they can try to get after it in games that should be much more competitive. If we're doing this same stuff without success against SC and Vandy, I will be very disappointed.that's still the question isn't it? why so vanilla?
by design because of the personnel and you just don't want to make a bad situation worse?
or the coaches really aren't that good on the offensive side of the ball and can't compensate for the issues?
don't know that we'll be able to start answering those questions anytime soon. maybe we'll see some hints in November.
i think most will be.I was probably harsh in my words. I really do wonder if they're just trying to survive the gauntlet with a serviceable roster so they can try to get after it in games that should be much more competitive. If we're doing this same stuff without success against SC and Vandy, I will be very disappointed.
the only other thing i'd add is this....I was probably harsh in my words. I really do wonder if they're just trying to survive the gauntlet with a serviceable roster so they can try to get after it in games that should be much more competitive. If we're doing this same stuff without success against SC and Vandy, I will be very disappointed.
that's still the question isn't it? why so vanilla?
by design because of the personnel and you just don't want to make a bad situation worse?
or the coaches really aren't that good on the offensive side of the ball and can't compensate for the issues?
don't know that we'll be able to start answering those questions anytime soon. maybe we'll see some hints in November.
i don't know if it will take 3 or 4 full cycles to do that, hell butch had us "there" with just 2 full cycles. by 2015, we were in a position to win 9 or 10 regular season games. by year 4 we were definitely in a position to win 10+.All new coaches and to the coaches all new players. A roster full of underdeveloped players, recruited for a different system, and some older players not having "bought in" to the new coaches and system. What could go wrong with that?
Give them some time, some of the players will develop, many won't. It will take at least two recruiting cycles to see a significant difference. It will take 3 and possbily four recruiting cycles to see the full effect of the Pruitt, good or bad. I believe it will be good, very good. But I thought that about some other coaches too.
Chip Kelly’s 0-5.If we had coaches who had the least bit of creativity, they'd be dialing up lots of slants, screens, and hitches to compensate for the lack of pass blocking. This staff is not even trying to put us in the best position to win tough games. Maybe once we get past Bama they'll open it up some but for now I think they are content with run-run-pass-punt.
If we had coaches who had the least bit of creativity, they'd be dialing up lots of slants, screens, and hitches to compensate for the lack of pass blocking. This staff is not even trying to put us in the best position to win tough games. Maybe once we get past Bama they'll open it up some but for now I think they are content with run-run-pass-punt.