I'm not running around in circles. No one has yet explained anything that Dooley has done this year to inspire the kind of confidence that we're seeing surround him. The fact that he has "good hair" and is "well spoken" means squat when it comes down to competing against the best in the SEC. The measuring stick will be how competitive he makes us when he has some actual talent to work with. That's the only thing that matters, and he hasn't gotten that shot yet. If you want to get all giddy like a school girl over the guy for no substantive reason, have at it.
This thread just needs to be closed. It's just going in circles.
Exactly... that's why I kinda thought this year would be a wash from the beginning. We didn't have the talent/depth. It would've been a wash for anyone.
I'm not running around in circles. No one has yet explained anything that Dooley has done this year to inspire the kind of confidence that we're seeing surround him. The fact that he has "good hair" and is "well spoken" means squat when it comes down to competing against the best in the SEC. The measuring stick will be how competitive he makes us when he has some actual talent to work with. That's the only thing that matters, and he hasn't gotten that shot yet. If you want to get all giddy like a school girl over the guy for no substantive reason, have at it.
For what it's worth Nick Saban, when asked which of his disciples he would least prefer being a coach in his backyard, responded this way- "well, 2 or 3 come to mind, but as of this day I would say definitely Derek Dooley. He is a much, much better head coach at this stage in his career than I was in mine." Saban said that 2 days before Lane Kiffin quit at Tennessee.
On a side note does anyone have an opinion on if the Rivals paysite is worth the money, does it provide any insight not available here?
I'm not trying to show that he won't do well here. I'm just trying to have people show me why they think he will ultimately be at that level b/c what it basically boils down to is winning championships (SEC and/or BCS). If all of these people just love Dooley and give him tons of praise (comparisons to Saban for example), then surely they've seen the light as to what makes him able to compete with the upper echelon of the SEC, correct?
They can't prove it b/c Dooley hasn't had that opportunity yet. They can point out some positives and some improvements, but those don't take you to that level. They just don't.
Good post.Win 8 games next season and close out recruiting well this spring and Dooley looks like a steal.
Dooley looks good now, but he needs to show consistent improvement to get a huge vote of confidence from me.
I like what he did this year (for the most part) and holding this team together was huge.
However, at the end of the day, he took a depleted Tennessee squad that was still better than Vandy and Memphis and right there with Ole Miss and Kentucky talent wise and won. So being a better coach than Houston Nutt and Joker Phillips is okay, but Tennessee fans should expect that from a Tennessee HC.
First off, let me say that I don't dislike Dooley. He's a personable coach that seems to relate well to the players. So, this isn't a knock against him or a statement that he won't ultimately do well at UT.
But, I kinda wish everyone would look at the 6 games we won and who they were against. The combined record of those teams is 23 - 44 (.343).
I understand the depth issues, and I understand the just overall lack of talent. I'm not arguing that we should've beaten any of the teams that we lost to necessarily. All of that is why I don't get how anyone can necessarily love or hate Dooley. But, pretty much all that I've seen on here is tons of praise for Dooley.
I have no clue if this coaching staff can ultimately compete with Meyer, Saban, Petrino, Spurrier, etc. Yet, people just continually praise him for winning those 6 games. I just really don't get it. Anyone care to explain that? And, again, I understand the depth/talent issues, but, even given that, there would've been no reason for us to lose to any of those 6 teams that we beat.
Win 8 games next season and close out recruiting well this spring and Dooley looks like a steal.
Dooley looks good now, but he needs to show consistent improvement to get a huge vote of confidence from me.
I like what he did this year (for the most part) and holding this team together was huge.
However, at the end of the day, he took a depleted Tennessee squad that was still better than Vandy and Memphis and right there with Ole Miss and Kentucky talent wise and won. So being a better coach than Houston Nutt and Joker Phillips is okay, but Tennessee fans should expect that from a Tennessee HC.
That's all I'm saying. Did he show some positive things? Sure. Did he show a negative thing here or there? Sure. He's no different than a lot of coaches that are worth their salt in their first year. My only real point was not understanding the jump between that kind of assessment and stating that he is essentially Saban v2.0.
Very few of us thought he was the second coming of Saban. in fact, I don't think I'd like him being Saban. Dooley is much more sociable and seems to have an awesome sense of humor (Saban is a grouchy ol' basterrrd.)
At any rate, most of the positivity is rational. You just have to get used to the delusion that comes with any large fan base. Look at UK - they think they're better than us every year. Clearly not.
Look around on this message board. There are plenty of mouth breathers on here that are convinced of what you just stated or at the very least that Dooley is the long-term solution.
And this bothers you how? Delicate sensibilities? Just move on. Some people think he will succeed, some don't. You seem to be stuck in the middle complaining.
One of the main reasons why it bothers me is b/c IF Dooley is not the solution, then I want him gone as soon as possible. I don't want another Fulmer situation where it gets dragged out for 4+ years. The more convinced people are that he's on that level of coaching, the longer it will take to get him out IF he's going 7-5 in 2012.
That's all I'm saying. Did he show some positive things? Sure. Did he show a negative thing here or there? Sure. He's no different than a lot of coaches that are worth their salt in their first year. My only real point was not understanding the jump between that kind of assessment and stating that he is essentially Saban v2.0.
Very few of us thought he was the second coming of Saban. in fact, I don't think I'd like him being Saban. Dooley is much more sociable and seems to have an awesome sense of humor (Saban is a grouchy ol' basterrrd.)
Nothing we can do about that right now. No way of knowing if he will fail.
He has shown some things that have given people hope. Why worry about it now? Waste of time.