Not ranked in top 10

#51
#51
Sorry you guys can't handle an opinion other than your own. And yeah, I'm a UT fan. Thinking dude from Arkansas is not better than DR and JH and we will have a much improved running attack makes me an idiot. Actually, the fact you never express an opinion on anything.....ever, makes you an idiot.

Okay, first of all "dude from Arkansas" has a name. I'm sorry that I believe that Cobi Hamilton is an All-SEC receiver this year, and allow me to apologize for all the analysts that agree with me. I wasn't aware we had punctured your thin skin. I don't believe that it's fair to say he's no better than a reserve for the Vols when he has produced every year and was a significant member of the best receiving corps in the conference last year. As for your running back opinion, it is ridiculous to say that two backs who haven't been able to break 300 yards a year rushing will be the top two backs in the conference and then get indignant when people say the opinion is crazy. If you are going to throw an opinion out there, prepare for the backlash because it always comes!
 
#54
#54
What people seem to forget is that we have started a majority of underclassman as lineman the past few years. This will be the first time that we will have a majority of third year plus players starting (1 Senior, 3 Juniors, and 1 Sophomore). Schools that have successful running games like Alabama and LSU don't usually start players until they are 3rd year players atleast (Junior, Redshirt Sophomore), unless they are just a complete stud. Skill players have an easier time of coming into college and contributing due to their abilities being based on speed, quickness, etc. A lineman's biggest hurdle when coming to the SEC is Strength. College weight programs are obviously very beneficial and the longer the players have to benefit the better. Lineman are built not recruited... These players have had the time to learn the schemes, they have had their 2+ years in the weight program, and they have had a lot of in-game experience. Time for them to show up and put it to use.

Another issue I have also pondered that I honestly don't know the answer to, is Bray's ability to audible, check off, etc. Simms was not a great QB when it came to passing, but for some reason we could always run better when he was in the game. Was he checking away from blitzes? Was he checking into runs when it looked promising? I have no idea, but you would think that the run game would have been better when Bray was in the game due to the defense having to respect his ability to pass. The opposite seemed true and Simms couldn't throw for shiz. If this theory has any legs, hopefully Bray will be in the film room learning how to play the mental side of the position because we all know he has the physical side going for him...

The third part of the puzzle I believe has to do with the blocking scheme. Zone blocking requires backs to be decisive and I think that is one of the things the backs have lacked. This maybe why they love DY so much. I just hope no matter what the problem is, someone fixed it...
 
#55
#55
I think we could have won the freakin National Championship last year and Eric would say that we don't have a chance at being successful this year and that we should Far Dewlee
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#56
#56
Not really. NFL trends usually take over college football. If the greatest league in the world can show there's more than one way to skin a cat then I think the SEC can as well.

There is a big difference in a league that condenses several divisions of college football, down to the best players in the world.
 
#58
#58
Okay, first of all "dude from Arkansas" has a name. I'm sorry that I believe that Cobi Hamilton is an All-SEC receiver this year, and allow me to apologize for all the analysts that agree with me. I wasn't aware we had punctured your thin skin. I don't believe that it's fair to say he's no better than a reserve for the Vols when he has produced every year and was a significant member of the best receiving corps in the conference last year. As for your running back opinion, it is ridiculous to say that two backs who haven't been able to break 300 yards a year rushing will be the top two backs in the conference and then get indignant when people say the opinion is crazy. If you are going to throw an opinion out there, prepare for the backlash because it always comes!

Oh excuse me for not mentioning his majesty by name!! Are you serious? And if you go back and actually read, I said ONE OF...which means top 5 or 6....which I think they will be. And i doubt I'm the only one who thinks DUDE is not the best WR in the SEC.....gimme a break man. I have no problem with people disagreeing with my opinion, but when they offer no reason why or offer anything in general to the discussion, I think its stupid.
 
#59
#59
So we will obviously be exactly the same as last year......

The reason I think this is because
1) Pissed off O Line
2) Passing will open it up immensely.
3) Jay Graham
4) Both huge recruits with huge upside
5) In order to win 8 or 9 games, they are going to have to produce (IMO of course.

Thanks for actually responding with something logical. Seriously.

1. If they weren't pissed at how they were playing by mid-season last year, they're a bunch of pansies--which I sincerely doubt. IMO, the OL WILL be improved but if Stone is still snapping with his non-dominant hand I'm going to have a stroke. How the hell is Bray going to pass the ball if it gets snapped to his ankles or 10 feet over his head? Also...Heistand was supposed to be an OL coaching savant...now that title goes to Pittman. Color me skeptical at this point.

2. Successful passing game will typically set up the run...we'll see. Still HIGHLY dependent upon the OL run blocking.

3. No doubt. If there's any ray of hope, its that we FINALLY have a RB coach.

4. Who? Borque and Watson? If you depend on Freshman to produce at any position, it usually means you're in trouble--and I don't see a Marcus Dupree, Jamal Lewis, or Adrian Peterson when I look at any or our Freshman.

5. In other news...the sky is blue.
 
#60
#60
There is a big difference in a league that condenses several divisions of college football, down to the best players in the world.

Sounds like what most people say the SEC is composed of. Percentages are not going to win a game. If you have a dominant passing game and a D that can create turnovers, you can easily win in the SEC.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#61
#61
4. Who? Borque and Watson? If you depend on Freshman to produce at any position, it usually means you're in trouble--and I don't see a Marcus Dupree, Jamal Lewis, or Adrian Peterson when I look at any or our Freshman.

No, I meant Neal and Lane.
 
#62
#62
4. Who? Borque and Watson? If you depend on Freshman to produce at any position, it usually means you're in trouble--and I don't see a Marcus Dupree, Jamal Lewis, or Adrian Peterson when I look at any or our Freshman.

No, I meant Neal and Lane.

I'm no star gazer so that argument is lost on me.

Chris Donald was a huge recruit with huge upside...so much so that a guy named Patrick Willis out of West TN was an afterthought.

I get the notion that some players come in with more caveat than others but Neal and Lane were no Marcus Dupree, Jamal Lewis, or Adrian Peterson.

They've yet to do much in the SEC. Here's hoping they do this year.
 
#64
#64
I'm no star gazer so that argument is lost on me.

Chris Donald was a huge recruit with huge upside...so much so that a guy named Patrick Willis out of West TN was an afterthought.

I get the notion that some players come in with more caveat than others but Neal and Lane were no Marcus Dupree, Jamal Lewis, or Adrian Peterson.

They've yet to do much in the SEC. Here's hoping they do this year.

What does Chris Donald have to do with Patrick Willis being an afterthought?
 
#66
#66
Sorry...damn I need to go to sleep.

Who was the LB we recruited over Willis?

Brooks. On a side note, Chris Donald was awful at LB against Milan. In fact Morris at Milan ran right at him because he couldn't shed a block from a FB. Never understood the love for him. He was a great running back in hs but laughable vs decent competition at lb.
 
#67
#67
here damit i am gonna tell you guys ok

neal and lane both have all the talent we need at the position

they just both need to concentrate on running and maybe even more so running after the catch out of the backfield

did you guys see what neal did last year as a receiver?

this man is a player

he can be in my backfield anytime
 
#68
#68
here damit i am gonna tell you guys ok

neal and lane both have all the talent we need at the position

they just both need to concentrate on running and maybe even more so running after the catch out of the backfield

did you guys see what neal did last year as a receiver?

this man is a player

he can be in my backfield anytime

Hell yeah, now thats more like it. Be careful with those opinions bud, highly frowned upon in here.....
 
#69
#69
We don't deserve to be ranked in the top 20 based on past performance. Part of this can be attributed to the poor play of the OL but the RBs need to make plays.
 
#70
#70
here damit i am gonna tell you guys ok

neal and lane both have all the talent we need at the position

they just both need to concentrate on running and maybe even more so running after the catch out of the backfield

did you guys see what neal did last year as a receiver?

this man is a player

he can be in my backfield anytime

Umm...nope. I'm not saying it.:blink:
 
#72
#72
Brooks. On a side note, Chris Donald was awful at LB against Milan. In fact Morris at Milan ran right at him because he couldn't shed a block from a FB. Never understood the love for him. He was a great running back in hs but laughable vs decent competition at lb.

Thank you. Daniel Brooks, got it.











Off to bed.
 
#73
#73
I'm optimistic that the running game is going to be improved, but I'm not going to place any of our running backs in the top ten of the leaque without them showing it first. I hope you are right and they are number 1 and 2 in the leaque, but I'll take the wait and see approach.
 
Advertisement



Back
Top