Not long ago Harry Reid said what he did today was "UnAmerican."

#51
#51
This will work out nicely when the GOP takes the senate back next election...Thanks dingy Harry.
 
#52
#52
lawgator1 said:
Vetted implies that the vote is then based on their credentials. Denying the vote just to score cheap points with mouthbreaters, of either party, hardly seems to serve any noble purpose.
Click to expand...

At least you acknowledge the pendulum swings both ways
 
#54
#54
Last edited:
#57
#57
MG1968 said:
Obama and the democrats need something to distract attention away from the never-ending ACA debacle.

This isn't going to work.
Click to expand...


I'm sure that has a lot to do with their running this through today. Not sure the Bachmann, Palin, Hannity, Limbaugh crowd will be able to resist the temptation to start talking about atheist judges, though.
 
#58
#58
lawgator1 said:
I'm sure that has a lot to do with their running this through today. Not sure the Bachmann, Palin, Hannity, Limbaugh crowd will be able to resist the temptation to start talking about atheist judges, though.
Click to expand...

and what would that matter since none of those you just mentioned have a vote in the matter of appointees
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#59
#59
Using every ploy they can in DC to get all the libtards they can there before the inevitable happens.
 
#60
#60
govols/cc said:
Using every ploy they can in DC to get all the libtards they can there before the inevitable happens.
Click to expand...

What is the inevitable the only inevitable I see right now is the shrinking gop demographics and even if they take the senate next year they will have defend 13 more seats come 2016 and we all know democrats tend to get more votes in presidential election years than off years.
Oh and "libtards " I hope your not older than 14 cause that is pretty middle schoolish.
 
#61
#61
DAVOL said:
What is the inevitable the only inevitable I see right now is the shrinking gop demographics and even if they take the senate next year they will have defend 13 more seats come 2016 and we all know democrats tend to get more votes in presidential election years than off years.
Oh and "libtards " I hope your not older than 14 cause that is pretty middle schoolish.
Click to expand...


Awwwwww. Sorry I hurt your feelings. Bet you feel like your entitled to something for nothing now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#62
#62
DAVOL said:
What is the inevitable the only inevitable I see right now is the shrinking gop demographics and even if they take the senate next year they will have defend 13 more seats come 2016 and we all know democrats tend to get more votes in presidential election years than off years.
Oh and "libtards " I hope your not older than 14 cause that is pretty middle schoolish.
Click to expand...




8 damn years of this bs leaves a bad taste in everybody's mouth..including libtards that we're lied to like the rest of us.
 
#63
#63
FLVOL69 said:
8 damn years of this bs leaves a bad taste in everybody's mouth..including libtards that we're lied to like the rest of us.
Click to expand...
Yeah you all said the same before last election you know when Rassmussen,Morris, and all the other fox shills were telling you how it was gonna be and then it wasn't.
 
#64
#64
#65
#65
I think this has it backwards with respect to judicial nominees. The procedural hurdle should be higher for people with lifetime appointments than for agency appointments and regular legislation.

Oh, and people should be required to actually filibuster, too--not just cast a vote on debate.
 
#66
#66
DAVOL said:
Yeah you all said the same before last election you know when Rassmussen,Morris, and all the other fox shills were telling you how it was gonna be and then it wasn't.
Click to expand...

We all know its a lose lose no matter what because our government is just too far gone to save but when we get a GOP president back in the White House it'll be worth it just to see libs crying & hopefully a lot of free loaders bucked out the system. Not to mention Obama's disaster repealed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#67
#67
Does a tyrannical majority control the House of Representatives? Why not have the filibuster there?
 
Last edited:
#68
#68
lawgator1 said:
And for the record, I have mixed emotions about this. Thing is, there is no doubt in my mind but that if the roles were reversed and Dems were filibustering like the GOP has been for some time now, the GOP would be passing the same rule change.

I mean, I get that partisan politics has something to do with some nominations, for every president. But this has been ridiculous as of late.
Click to expand...

Show the numbers where Obama's nominees are being held up longer than Bush's
 
#69
#69
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#70
#70
VolFan32 said:
Show the numbers where Obama's nominees are being held up longer than Bush's
Click to expand...

Do Obama Nominees Face Stiffer Senate Opposition? - Washington Wire - WSJ
Last paragraph of story
Mr. Obama is also the only one of the five most recent presidents whose average and median waiting time for circuit and district court nominees from confirmation to nomination was more than six months.

The New GOP Plan to Block Obama's Judicial Nominees | Mother Jones
3rd paragraph last sentence.
(Overall, Obama's judicial nominees have waited an average of 277 days before getting a confirmation vote, compared with 175 during the George W. Bush administration.)

Your Welcome
 
#71
#71
DAVOL said:
What is the inevitable the only inevitable I see right now is the shrinking gop demographics and even if they take the senate next year they will have defend 13 more seats come 2016 and we all know democrats tend to get more votes in presidential election years than off years.
Oh and "libtards " I hope your not older than 14 cause that is pretty middle schoolish.
Click to expand...

Pretty accurate description of most liberals. I can think of a few others that begin with C and rhyme with bunts, or F and rhymes with rags.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#73
#73
DAVOL said:
Do Obama Nominees Face Stiffer Senate Opposition? - Washington Wire - WSJ
Last paragraph of story
Mr. Obama is also the only one of the five most recent presidents whose average and median waiting time for circuit and district court nominees from confirmation to nomination was more than six months.

The New GOP Plan to Block Obama's Judicial Nominees | Mother Jones
3rd paragraph last sentence.
(Overall, Obama's judicial nominees have waited an average of 277 days before getting a confirmation vote, compared with 175 during the George W. Bush administration.)

Your Welcome
Click to expand...

What did this prove other than you are a partisan douchebag?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#74
#74
DAVOL said:
Do Obama Nominees Face Stiffer Senate Opposition? - Washington Wire - WSJ
Last paragraph of story
Mr. Obama is also the only one of the five most recent presidents whose average and median waiting time for circuit and district court nominees from confirmation to nomination was more than six months.

The New GOP Plan to Block Obama's Judicial Nominees | Mother Jones
3rd paragraph last sentence.
(Overall, Obama's judicial nominees have waited an average of 277 days before getting a confirmation vote, compared with 175 during the George W. Bush administration.)

Your Welcome
Click to expand...

I hate to be that guy, but You're..

Libtard phrase proven correct once again :salute:
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top