No wrong doing (says UTK Chancellor)

[JohnD13]

when will butch come clean about what really happened?? I'm tired of this.

Not as tired as I am of people pushing their agenda even after he's been cleared.

 

[DNBVOL]

Not as tired as I am of people pushing their agenda even after he's been cleared.

Exactly. They're just wasting air at this point. Butt hurt that nothing came of their little falsified fantasy.

 

[MWAVolfan]

I don't believe anything unless it's on espn.

 

[BowlBrother85]

when will butch come clean about what really happened?? I'm tired of this.

Why don't you tell us exactly what happened since you seem to know?

 

[butchna]

Not as tired as I am of people pushing their agenda even after he's been cleared.

I liked this...damn negavols! :aggressive:

 

[RonJovi]

He didn't ask a question.... He asked if Butch had a comment.

Uhhhhh....

 

[BowlBrother85]

Uhhhhh....

He's right. Stokes made an accusation with an assertion of proof beyond reproach under the guise of a question by designating his unnamed source as being a "really good authority". That was unprofessional. If he had simply asked Butch, "Did you have an altercation with Mack Crowder in August?" that would have been a question and been completely acceptable.

If you are going to designate one of your sources as a "really good authority" then you should identify the source so that label can be verified. If you are not able or willing to identify a source then no such designation should be given. At the very least Stokes was incredibly unprofessional. By no stretch is he a legitimate journalist. That was clumsy as hell.