No Longer a Joke: Killings at Waffle House

#77
#77
1972 Grad said:
Can you get replacement nuts? My brother had a couple of liver biopsies, and he said that wasn't fun.
Click to expand...

Fairly certain they have yet to pioneer testicular transplants. Not sure if they ever biopsied my liver. I do remember having needles stuck in my belly every other week to drain fluid. That sucked. Had to have a bone marrow biopsy after the surgery, but it wasn't as bad as I thought it would be.
 
#78
#78
luthervol said:
That's like saying a 21 year old drinking age only penalizes the law abiding citizens.

A 45 mph speed limit only penalizes the law abiding citizens.

Laws enforcing the payment of taxes only penalize the law abiding citizens.

The fact that criminals break laws and law abiding citizens follow laws has never been a reason to not have laws.
Click to expand...

This makes absolutely no sense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#80
#80
Weezer said:
Fairly certain they have yet to pioneer testicular transplants. Not sure if they ever biopsied my liver. I do remember having needles stuck in my belly every other week to drain fluid. That sucked. Had to have a bone marrow biopsy after the surgery, but it wasn't as bad as I thought it would be.
Click to expand...

How have you been holding up? I know it was tough for you for what seemed like an eternity?
 
#86
#86
The hero? An articulate well dressed black man just yupped and disarmed that white ar-15 gun toting criminal

He is damn lucky a cop din’t shoot him in the back. TIC LOL

Yep. Everybody needs an ar-15 in case those squirrels storm your house
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#87
#87
Weezer said:
Fairly certain they have yet to pioneer testicular transplants. Not sure if they ever biopsied my liver. I do remember having needles stuck in my belly every other week to drain fluid. That sucked. Had to have a bone marrow biopsy after the surgery, but it wasn't as bad as I thought it would be.
Click to expand...
His liver biopsies consisted of sticking a pretty good sized needle (14 gauge??) in his back between his ribs, and fishing around in the liver to try to hit a tumor the size of a pea. He said it took several sticks, and that he had to hold his breath while the needle was in because breathing would make the liver move due to lungs expanding. I think it took several different people to take a shot at it with several sticks, and about an hour each time.
 
#93
#93
PointGuard said:
The hero? An articulate well dressed black man just yupped and disarmed that white ar-15 gun toting criminal

He is damn lucky a cop din’t shoot him in the back. TIC LOL

Yep. Everybody needs an ar-15 in case those squirrels storm your house
Click to expand...

Why did you feel it necessary to point out that he was articulate and well dressed?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 5 people
#94
#94
Weezer said:
Is it? If the guy had used a knife and went in stabbing people, would you be calling for a ban on knives? Should fertilizer be banned, because we know it can be used in bomb making. It's not about the tool. It's about who uses the tool. I don't understand blaming an inanimate object for how a dumbass uses it. But hell, let's just totally eliminate personal responsibility and stop holding individuals accountable for their actions. It's not their fault. It's that damn gun.
Click to expand...

If he hid land mines in the parking lot, I would say lets ban (or heavily regulate) land mines.

If he threw grenades in, I'd say let's ban (or heavily regulate) grenades.

If he released mustard gas, I'd say let's ban (or heavily regulate) mustard gas.

If he beat people to death with a baseball bat, I WOULD NOT say let's ban (or heavily regulate) baseball bats.

NO ONE IS BLAMING THE GUN. EVERYONE IS BLAMING THE INDIVIDUAL.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#95
#95
K-town Vol Fan said:
Its because said inanimate objects sole purpose is to kill, and these AR 15s are extremely efficient at it. Citizens should not be allowed to purchase them.
Click to expand...

So there is nothing else that can be done with an AR other than to kill people?
 
#96
#96
Weezer said:
Honest question. Do you think limiting the availability of guns really solves the problem? If your argument is guns are a weapon of convenience, then won't crazy people just gravitate toward the next most convenient weapon? What then?
Click to expand...

Honest answer. Of course limiting the availability of guns would not completely solve the problem, but it would help.

I think 13 million assault style weapons are preferable to 18 million.

I think a maximum capacity of x rounds per y seconds is better than a capacity of x + 50 rounds per y seconds.
 
#97
#97
luthervol said:
If he hid land mines in the parking lot, I would say lets ban (or heavily regulate) land mines.

If he threw grenades in, I'd say let's ban (or heavily regulate) grenades.

If he released mustard gas, I'd say let's ban (or heavily regulate) mustard gas.

If he beat people to death with a baseball bat, I WOULD NOT say let's ban (or heavily regulate) baseball bats.

NO ONE IS BLAMING THE GUN. EVERYONE IS BLAMING THE INDIVIDUAL.
Click to expand...

But in each example above you were for regulating the object except for the bat. Why?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#99
#99
luthervol said:
Honest answer. Of course limiting the availability of guns would not completely solve the problem, but it would help.

I think 13 million assault style weapons are preferable to 18 million.

I think a maximum capacity of x rounds per y seconds is better than a capacity of x + 50 rounds per y seconds.
Click to expand...

There you go thinking again.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top