No Kings

#851
#851
So someone actually got a video of the lady that attacked a dude holding an American flag at our rally here in the Outer Banks. The woman stopped her car got out and stated something to the effect of that’s my American flag. And then this ensued…

Facebook

www.facebook.com www.facebook.com
 
#852
#852
luthervol said:
You highlighted the big difference.
NO ONE on the left believed the crap about how sharp Biden was because the left is not nearly as gullible as a huge segment of the right, a segment that will believe, like, and repost everything that crosses their screen.
Click to expand...
Your lack of self awareness is astounding
 
  • Like
Reactions: UT_Dutchman, WeeohdeeWood, InVOLuntary and 6 others
#853
#853
McDad said:
Yall should actually read this. It not only expresses the incidents have dropped on the right but also they have increased on the left since the "cancerous" president took over.

Also, excluded the assassination attempt in Butler.
Click to expand...

Go down the rabbit hole and read the metrology and support data. That “study” is trash. The antifa riots are not political violence but the mother throwing a text book at the wall at a school board meeting is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary, midnight orange, Vol since 77 and 5 others
#854
#854
McDad said:
Yall should actually read this. It not only expresses the incidents have dropped on the right but also they have increased on the left since the "cancerous" president took over.

Also, excluded the assassination attempt in Butler.
Click to expand...
And BLM riots, other left wing violence because the author of the study was involved in them..it also take jailhouse gang violence and calls it right wing...anything thing slightly associated right wing whether it was the motivation or not was consider RW..while the LW wasn't applied the same way..it's a scam study
 
  • Like
Reactions: UT_Dutchman, Vol since 77, McDad and 1 other person
#855
#855
Orangeslice13 said:
Go down the rabbit hole and read the metrology and support data. That “study” is trash. The antifa riots are not political violence but the mother throwing a text book at the wall at a school board meeting is.
Click to expand...

In this research we address these gaps by comparing the use of political violence by left-wing, right-wing, and Islamist extremists in the United States and worldwide using two unique datasets that cover real-world examples of politically motivated, violent behaviors. Across both datasets, we find that radical acts perpetrated by individuals associated with left-wing causes are less likely to be violent. In the United States, we find no difference between the level of violence perpetrated by right-wing and Islamist extremists. However, differences in violence emerge on the global level, with Islamist extremists being more likely than right-wing extremists to engage in more violent acts.
 
#857
#857
luthervol said:

In this research we address these gaps by comparing the use of political violence by left-wing, right-wing, and Islamist extremists in the United States and worldwide using two unique datasets that cover real-world examples of politically motivated, violent behaviors. Across both datasets, we find that radical acts perpetrated by individuals associated with left-wing causes are less likely to be violent. In the United States, we find no difference between the level of violence perpetrated by right-wing and Islamist extremists. However, differences in violence emerge on the global level, with Islamist extremists being more likely than right-wing extremists to engage in more violent acts.
Click to expand...
That's a joke of a survey..from the start using terrorist incidents world wide vs individual level at the States is the least aggregious act of the study. And it used here..I could go further indepth but it'd be lost on a teacher who whole existence is based on the fallacy of appealing to authority which he does here blindly again..
 
  • Like
Reactions: UT_Dutchman, InVOLuntary and hjeagle1vol
#858
#858
FLVOL_79 said:
If no one believed the malarkey about Biden he wouldn't have been on the primary ballots. I think the left knew something was wrong but didn't want to accept/believed it. Kind of like how people who get septum piercings think it looks cool but deep down they know they look like gutterskanks.
Click to expand...
I'd say most knew he was a vegetable, but they would rather have unelected deep state sludge running the country than a duly elected Trump.

You know... Like... "No Kings" and stuff.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UT_Dutchman, InVOLuntary, norrislakevol and 1 other person
#860
#860
whodeycin85 said:
That's a joke of a survey..from the start using terrorist incidents world wide vs individual level at the States is the least aggregious act of the study. And it used here..I could go further indepth but it'd be lost on a teacher who whole existence is based on the fallacy of appealing to authority which he does here blindly again..
Click to expand...
do a little research......but we all know you will not

ccjls.scholasticahq.com

Far-left versus Far-right Fatal Violence: An Empirical Assessment of the Prevalence of Ideologically Motivated Homicides in the United States | Published in Criminology, Criminal Justice, Law & Society

By Celinet Duran. Using data from the U.S. Extremist Crime Database, this exploratory study examines the differences between far-left and far-right ideologically motivated fatal violence between 1990 and 2020.
ccjls.scholasticahq.com ccjls.scholasticahq.com

The findings from this study echo a large
body of research pointing towards an increased threat
by far-right extremism over other ideological
perspectives. The results indicate that the far-right
remains the greatest threat to public safety for the most
severe form of violence, namely ideologically
motivated homicide.
 
#861
#861
Orangeslice13 said:
Go down the rabbit hole and read the metrology and support data. That “study” is trash. The antifa riots are not political violence but the mother throwing a text book at the wall at a school board meeting is.
Click to expand...
As I was reading it, I was wondering about the ANTIFAs, and 'autonymous zones' which sprung up in the last cycle of R political violence.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orangeslice13, Good Ol' Charlie Brown and whodeycin85
#863
#863
luthervol said:
do a little research......but we all know you will not

ccjls.scholasticahq.com

Far-left versus Far-right Fatal Violence: An Empirical Assessment of the Prevalence of Ideologically Motivated Homicides in the United States | Published in Criminology, Criminal Justice, Law & Society

By Celinet Duran. Using data from the U.S. Extremist Crime Database, this exploratory study examines the differences between far-left and far-right ideologically motivated fatal violence between 1990 and 2020.
ccjls.scholasticahq.com ccjls.scholasticahq.com

The findings from this study echo a large
body of research pointing towards an increased threat
by far-right extremism over other ideological
perspectives. The results indicate that the far-right
remains the greatest threat to public safety for the most
severe form of violence, namely ideologically
motivated homicide.
Click to expand...
Come on man.... The definitions are wall and ambiguous. The focus on fatal incidents as opposed to property violence etc are excluded.. Then there is the anything even slightly attached right wing whether even if the motive doesn't involve tw to agenda is right wing... Anything anti government. Again a biased and weak study.. Not surprised keep trying... Now historically RW have included more violence but recently the majority is on the left..

Let me ask you this . If a white supremist in jail kills a man over a drug deal... Is that rw violence in your eyes??
 
#864
#864
McDad said:
As I was reading it, I was wondering about the ANTIFAs, and 'autonymous zones' which sprung up in the last cycle of R political violence.
Click to expand...
Chas Chop isn't considered lw violence even tonight people were killed and attacked there..
 
  • Like
Reactions: McDad
#865
#865
whodeycin85 said:
Chas Chop isn't considered lw violence even tonight people were killed and attacked there..
Click to expand...
Just thought of another.

Would Ted Kazljgaj;oingn...you know, the unabomber, be considered L or R terrorism and violence or is he also excluded? Wasn't he radicalized by Al Gore's lies, too??
 
#867
#867
whodeycin85 said:
Come on man.... The definitions are wall and ambiguous. The focus on fatal incidents as opposed to property violence etc are excluded.. Then there is the anything even slightly attached right wing whether even if the motive doesn't involve tw to agenda is right wing... Anything anti government. Again a biased and weak study.. Not surprised keep trying... Now historically RW have included more violence but recently the majority is on the left..

Let me ask you this . If a white supremist in jail kills a man over a drug deal... Is that rw violence in your eyes??
Click to expand...
It's certainly violence committed by a right wing person....but probably not politically motivated.

We can do this all day. I can post study after study.
 
#871
#871
FLVOL_79 said:
34 pages into a thread about a rally that apparently "no one cared" about. Interesting.


New polling, though, reinforces how much the thrust of the “No Kings” message has resonated with much of the American public.

In fact, a majority of Americans appear sympathetic to it, at least to some extent. And their ranks appear to be growing.

The survey from the Public Religion Research Institute gave people two options. One was that Trump is a “potentially dangerous dictator whose power should be limited before he destroys democracy.” The other was that he’s a “strong leader who should be given the power he needs to restore America’s greatness.”

Americans chose the “dictator” option by a strong margin, 56%-41%.


And notably, that margin has nearly doubled since April, when Americans also sided with the “dictator” option but by a smaller, 52%-44% margin.

The same poll also showed a 54% majority sided with the view that Trump is waging an “assault on constitutional balances and the rule of law.” The alternative was that his overhaul of the federal government is “a long-overdue correction of disastrous policies” (43%).
Click to expand...
Ok we know how accurate polls are. Kind like MSDNC showing a 2017 clip from Boston saying it was the crowd at a No Kings protest
 
  • Like
Reactions: Good Ol' Charlie Brown and hjeagle1vol
#872
#872
whodeycin85 said:
That's a joke of a survey..from the start using terrorist incidents world wide vs individual level at the States is the least aggregious act of the study. And it used here..I could go further indepth but it'd be lost on a teacher who whole existence is based on the fallacy of appealing to authority which he does here blindly again..
Click to expand...
Teacher 😆 Luther only made social worker status.
Sad really…those that can’t do - teach, those that can’t teach become social workers. He won’t tell us how many kids he trannied up. He’s the sickness that defines America now.
 
#873
#873
LSU-SIU said:
Okay, can you you show us?
Click to expand...
I'll not only provide you a fish......which I have already done,
I will teach you how to fish.

Google something like right-wing and left-wing violence.

or....comparison of politically motivated violence based on ideology

Be creative.....google is amazing.

Report back!!
 
#875
#875
luthervol said:
I'll not only provide you a fish......which I have already done,
I will teach you how to fish.

Google something like right-wing and left-wing violence.

or....comparison of politically motivated violence based on ideology

Be creative.....google is amazing.

Report back!!
Click to expand...

We can do this all day. I can post study after study.
Click to expand...

You can do this all day long, go ahead and post them. Thanks.
 
New Posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

Advertisement



Back
Top