The proposed settlement in the House case, if carried out, will put university based NIL in direct competition with private NIL collectives, booster clubs, and individual boosters.
Given that most of the P4 schools are public universities, that seems to be putting them in direct competition with the private sector. It also is explicitly anti competitive, as it seems to drive private NIL entities out of the market.
That sounds like another Sherman Antitrust Act violation to me. It also conflicts with the injunction in the Tennessee vs NCAA case.
No litigation, no litigation, mo kitigation.