BigOrange15
Never Falter, Never Yield
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2009
- Messages
- 23,482
- Likes
- 37,502
This whole debate kind of reminds me of one of my favorite movies, when a female color commentator goes on and on about the color of the uniforms and her friend snaps that people don't give a damn about uniforms and only want to hear about touchdowns and injuries. We're now 20 pages in on a thread about uniforms![]()
![]()
Some checkerboard on the helmet? I hope that isn't what we'll see--looks terrible, even on just a part of the helmet. Otherwise, I like the rest of the look--powerful.
I was under the impression that they would be keeping the lady vols style and logo for the women's basketball team only. I'm really dissapointed in that. Just murdered a legacy in broad daylight.
part of that legacy has always been lady vols-only fans who wear different colors, sport different logos, and generally seem to define themselves as fans by aggressively not being fans of the men's teams. That's a branding disaster.
I started out sympathetic to those on the pro-lady vols side of the debate, but the more posts i see like this one from fans who complain that getting rid of the baby blue trim would be somehow "murdering [pat summitt's] legacy," the more i'm convinced that getting rid of the separate lady vols branding is the right thing to do.
