There is a perception among some certain other team's fans that Tennessee is not a very good team. This perception seems to stem from Tennessee's two losses, which, admittedly, were not very pretty to behold.
However, I wonder if those same people have the same perception of USC. USC has now lost two games, games in which they were heavily favored. In fact, one could argue that losing to a 41 point underdog is the same as getting beat by 41 points to a team with comparable talent. Yet the prevailing perception seems to be not that USC is a bad team, but that they need to make some adjustments.
One could also make a very good argument that the Tennessee team of the last 2 weeks is a much better team than the first few. They are running the ball. They're playing light years better on special teams and defense. In fact, looking at the situation rationally, one would argue that this Tennessee team is drastically improved, so making projections about this season based on Tennessee's losses is very irrational. Don't you think?
However, I wonder if those same people have the same perception of USC. USC has now lost two games, games in which they were heavily favored. In fact, one could argue that losing to a 41 point underdog is the same as getting beat by 41 points to a team with comparable talent. Yet the prevailing perception seems to be not that USC is a bad team, but that they need to make some adjustments.
One could also make a very good argument that the Tennessee team of the last 2 weeks is a much better team than the first few. They are running the ball. They're playing light years better on special teams and defense. In fact, looking at the situation rationally, one would argue that this Tennessee team is drastically improved, so making projections about this season based on Tennessee's losses is very irrational. Don't you think?